LIVE RESULTS: Democrats Pull Off Political Power Grab in Virginia
Fetterman Breaks Ranks With HIs Party Again – Over Their Support for Iran
It's Time to SNAP Out of Government Dependence
Jake Tapper Puts the Clown Nose on With Colbert; Press Ignores Hundreds From...
The Gospel According to Democrats
Here's Chris Murphy's Lame Excuse for Why He Cheered for Iran Evading Our...
Trump's Frustration and Iran's Delaying Tactics
Lawyers Sue for Higher Prices
Israel Has Already Repaired Statue of Jesus, Jailed Soldiers, After Viral Incident Draws...
President Trump Urges Iran to Free Eight Women Sentenced to Death Ahead of...
President Trump Just Extended the Iran Ceasefire
These Leftist Liars Have No Shame
Virginia Approves Heavily Gerrymandered Congressional Map in Referendum
Leftist SPLC Indicted on 11 Counts of Fraud
Abigail Spanberger's Regime Oversees Illegal Alien Crime Wave
OPINION

Calif. court considers Prop 8 legal question

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Calif. court considers Prop 8 legal question
SAN FRANCISCO (BP)--California's Supreme Court appeared poised Tuesday to side with supporters of traditional marriage in a critical case that will help determine whether Proposition 8 is constitutional.
Advertisement

At issue during oral arguments was not the issue of "gay marriage" itself, but instead the question of whether ProtectMarriage.com -- the group that sponsored Prop 8 -- has what is called legal standing and can, under state law, defend the constitutional amendment in federal court.

The issue came to the forefront when former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and former Attorney General Jerry Brown (who is now governor) chose not to defend Prop 8 in court.

If the California court rules that ProtectMarriage.com has legal standing, then the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals -- which asked the California court to consider the legal standing issue -- will rule on Prop 8 and the definition of marriage. Opponents of Prop 8 argue that ProtectMarriage.com does not have legal standing and that it has no right to appeal last year's lower court ruling striking down Prop 8.

Passed in 2008, Prop 8 defines marriage as between a man and a woman.

During oral arguments, a majority of justices appeared skeptical to the argument that ProtectMarriage.com does not have legal standing. If it lacked it, some of them suggested, the governor and attorney general in essence would have the power to veto a citizen-approved initiative -- simply by not defending it in court.

Advertisement

Justice Joyce Kennard said if the court ruled against ProtectMarriage.com it "would nullify the great power pertaining to proposing and adopting state constitutional amendments."

Andy Pugno, an attorney with ProtectMarriage.com, said in an email to supporters that oral arguments went "fantastic."

"The justices seemed baffled by our opponents' extreme position," Pugno wrote. "According to them, our opponents should be entitled to challenge a voter-passed measure and, upon convincing the State's Attorney General not to oppose the lawsuit, exclude the measure's official proponents from the courtroom -- such that the majority of voters go completely unrepresented. As one justice said, 'that just defies common sense.'"

A written ruling is expected within 90 days.

Compiled by Michael Foust, associate editor of Baptist Press.

Copyright (c) 2011 Southern Baptist Convention, Baptist Press www.BPNews.net

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement