Whoever Edited this Clip About Biden Deserves Major Props...And Trump Certainly Noticed It
'ISIS Dry Run'? We Know How Two Jordanians Tried to Infiltrate a US...
'Wait, They Left': College Kids Stumped By Simple Questions About Israel and Hamas
Morehouse Might Cancel Graduation Ceremonies 'On the Spot' if This Happens During Biden's...
What if Biden Wins in November? Part One
The Despicable Crime of Indoctrinating Young Children
CNN Analyst Shocked By Trump's Surge In Support Among Surprising Group
NYT Claims Justice Samuel Alito Sent 'Stop the Steal' Message Outside His Home
Why These Voters Say the Trump Trial Is Backfiring on Democrats
Trades Keep America Running, and We Need Them Now More Than Ever!
Sham Elections Garner Farcical 8 Percent Support in Iran
Heil Harvard!
A Californian Visits the U.S.A.
False Bravado: Joe Biden is our Debater-in-Chief?
Happy Anniversary to Lois Lerner!
Tipsheet

Chairman Dick Durbin Reveals He's Moving Ahead With 'Ethics' Code for SCOTUS After 4th of July

AP Photo/Susan Walsh, Pool

ProPublica was out with another hit piece on a conservative Supreme Court justice on Wednesday, this time against Justice Samuel Alito. He got ahead of it, though, as Katie covered. In predictable fashion, Senate Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) announced a markup of "Supreme Court Ethics Reform Legislation" following the 4th of July recess. The press release made it a point to mention the ProPublica report in question. 

Advertisement

For good measure, Durbin and Whitehouse released a statement to lament the "crisis."

The legislation in question, the Supreme Court Code of Conduct Act, was introduced in April by Sens. Angus King (I-ME) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), neither of who are on the Judiciary Committee. It would require, among other things, the Supreme Court to create a code of conduct to be made available to the public. 

Murkowski is the only Republican co-sponsor of the bill. For all the chatter from The Hill, Republicans who may or may not support it--members like Sens. Thom Tillis (R-NC), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)--it's still uncertain as to if the bill will earn the nine Republican votes to pass in the chamber. 

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is certainly not among those who support the bill. "Look, the Supreme Court, in my view, can’t be dictated to by Congress. I think the chief justice will address these issues. Congress should stay out of it, because we don’t, I think, have the jurisdiction to tell the Supreme Court how to handle the issue," he indicated on Wednesday. "I have total confidence in Chief Justice John Roberts to in effect look out for the court as well as its reputation," he also said. 

Advertisement

While he says he supports the bill, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) curiously would not speak to bringing the bill to the floor. "I support their bill, it’s going to come out of Judiciary. Let’s see what happens there first," he told reporters, also on Wednesday. 

Alito addressed the ProPublica report in an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal. In response to another ProPublica report back in April about Justice Clarence Thomas, the Wall Street Journal also published an opinion piece heavily criticizing that report. 

This latest development comes after Durbin had invited Chief Justice John Roberts in April to appear before the Committee on May 2 for a hearing on "Supreme Court Ethics Reform." The chief justice declined in a letter, highlighting how obscure the risk was and citing the separation of powers, effectively telling the chairman to stay in his lane. He also indicated that he had attached a statement of ethics that the current justices subscribe to. 

That hearing did take place, during which Republican members highlighted at length how the left has viciously attacked the conservative justices, including and especially Thomas. Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), in detailing the long history of such a partisan crusade, pointed to all the conservative justices, except for Amy Coney Barrett, had been the subject of smear campaigns from the media in recent weeks.

Advertisement

Liberal justices have had ethics concerns of their own, such as Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who failed to recuse herself from cases involving Penguin Random House, despite how she was paid $3 million by the publisher for her books. The media did not take a similar interest as they have in conservative justices, though. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement