It's Not Hard to See Why NPR's New CEO Dodged This Simple Question...
Did The Washington Post Take Orders from Biden WH to Go After a...
The Republicans Are Really a Mess
UK Police Officer Had an Odd Exchange with a Jewish Bystander During Pro-Hamas...
Google Doesn’t Want You to Read This
Democrats Give More Credence to Donald Trump's Talk of a 'Rigged Witch Hunt'
Jesse Watters Blamed for Reading WaPo
'Our Constitution Was Made Only for a Moral and Religious People,' Part Three
DeSantis Honors Bay of Pigs Veterans on Invasion’s 63rd Anniversary
Corrupt Letitia James Asks Judge to Reject Trump's $175 Million Bond
Dem Official Says It's 'Not a News Story' Would-Be School Shooter Identifies As...
Gun Control Enables Sexual Violence
'Hating America, 101' – A Course for Homegrown Terrorists?
Illegal Immigrants Find Creative Ways to Cross Over the Border In Arizona
MSNBC Claims Russia, Saudi Arabia Is Plotting to Help Trump Get Elected
OPINION

A Reply to Rush Limbaugh

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Rush Limbaugh is a savvy guy who thinks Republican leaders are wrong to shun the idea of another government shutdown. Appearing on "Fox News Sunday," he argued that the only important poll is the one held on Election Day. "(The GOP) won a landslide election 10 months after that so-called shutdown. ... The essence of a poll is an election, and I've got two of them. And we would have won in 2012 if four million Republicans hadn't stayed home."

Advertisement

The belief that Romney would have won in 2012 if millions of Republicans hadn't sat out the election is widely shared on the right, but it's probably not true. Sean Trende, one of the country's most careful election analysts, examined turnout data for RealClearPolitics. Counties that voted for Ross Perot tended to show a drop-off in 2012, suggesting that a possible 6.5 million white voters were "missing" in 2012. But, as Trende observes, Romney would have had to win those voters by 90 percent to alter the outcome of the election, and considering that he won an average of 60 percent of white votes, that seems farfetched.

Democrats plan for decades to achieve their goals. They aim to "fundamentally transform" the United States into a social democratic nation like France, Germany and, well, Greece. When they gain majorities, they push their agenda to the breaking point, as they did in 2009 with Obamacare -- a vote that cost them dearly in electoral defeats (and is now lamented by Sens. Schumer and Harkin). Half of the senators who voted for Obamacare are no longer in office, and Democrats have lost control of both houses.

Republicans want to shrink government, revive the mediating institutions of society like family, community groups and churches, improve national defense, and restore economic vitality by removing government-imposed burdens on small business. A key ambition, universally endorsed by Republicans, is repealing and replacing Obamacare.

Unlike Democrats, though, Republicans are hampered by distrust of one another. Limbaugh feeds this atmosphere of suspicion by suggesting that the reason Republican leaders are avoiding another shutdown is that they secretly support what Obama has done on immigration. "The Republicans want what Obama wants on immigration, and they are using the government shutdown as an excuse to not stop (him)."

Advertisement

There is little doubt that the shutdown damaged the party's standing. Polls showed that approval of the Republican Party hit an all-time low of 32 percent during the shutdown. Fifty-three percent of Americans blamed the GOP for the impasse, versus only 29 percent who blamed the president. Approval of Congress registered at 12 percent, with 85 percent disapproving and 70 percent strongly disapproving.

And for what? After three and a half weeks of predictable and predicted bad press, Republicans were forced to reopen the government having achieved nothing. The shutdown was a triumph of politics as tantrum. There could be no path to repealing Obamacare while Democrats controlled the Senate and Obama sat in the Oval Office.

There are two reasons that Republicans will always get blamed for government shutdowns. 1) The press will, without fail, report the shutdown as the Republicans' doing and highlight the suffering of those whose checks fail to arrive or whose businesses are harmed or whatever, and 2) Democrats are the government party. Even low-information voters know that Democrats are for government, and Republicans more or less against. Government shutdowns permit Republicans to be caricatured as irresponsible anarchists who cannot be trusted with power.

While it's true that Republicans won in 2014 despite their 2013 foolishness, we have the enduring stability of the American electorate to credit for that. When dissatisfied, American voters don't take to the streets; they simply vote for the other party. Considering Obama's blunders, it's possible that Republicans would have done even better last month if the shutdown had never happened. New Hampshire and Virginia were close.

Advertisement

Rather than impugning one another's motives, the chief job of Republicans over the next two years will be to send reform bills to the president's desk that broad majorities of the American people support. When he vetoes them, the issues will be squarely presented to the voters in 2016. That's the only path to repealing Obamacare, reversing the president's unconstitutional executive order, and generally getting the ship of state righted.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos