The fact that Cao represents a horrible district and will probably not be re-elected should have liberated him to do the right thing -- without regard for political considerations. The fact that he will probably not be re-elected should have reinforced his decision to vote "no" -- instead, it persuaded him to vote "aye".
Appeasement, of course, never works. Does Cao really think Democrats will reward him for this? Does he really think Democrats in Louisiana will prefer a squishy Republican over a real liberal Democrat?
Cao's vote has serious implications, inasmuch as it provides Democrats with the rhetorical cover to argue this was a bipartisan bill.
Make no mistake, this was a legacy vote. Cao had one term to make his legacy. ... And he has.
Al Qaeda: We'll Strike The U.S. If You Execute The Boston Bomber
Hillary May Interview With FBI This Weekend
Hillary Clinton and Identity Politics
The FBI is Livid About Bill Clinton's Secret Meeting With Loretta Lynch
I Am Never Going To Be a Part of Your Sick Liberal Worldview
No, Hillary, It Is Not Time to Move On