Here's What a CNN Host Said About Tim Walz That Left Scott Jennings...
What ICE Agents Did After Eating Lunch at a Mexican Restaurant in MN...
Wait, That's How a Local Minnesota Dem Described the Leftist Violence Against ICE
Lawrence O'Donnell's Selective Outrage at Vulgarity, and Abby Phillip Gets Debunked by Abb...
Jacob Frey Cannot Get His Way
INSANITY: Mob of Leftist Rioters Stab and Beat Anti-Islam Activist in Minneapolis
U.S. Strike in Syria Kills Terrorist Linked to Murder of American Soldiers
Florida Man Convicted of $4.5M Scheme to Defraud U.S. Military Fuel Program
Chinese National Pleads Guilty to $27 Million Scam Targeting 2,000 Elderly Victims Nationw...
Orange County Man Arrested for Alleged Instagram Death Threats Against VP JD Vance
Hannity Grills Democrat Shri Thanedar After He Admits Voting Against Deporting Illegal Sex...
$68 Million Medicaid Fraud: Two Plead Guilty Over Brooklyn Adult Day Care Scheme
The Trump Administration Just Announced New Tariffs on Countries Deploying Troops to Green...
Minneapolis Alleged Gang Member, Felon Charged After Allegedly Stealing Rifle From FBI Veh...
JD Vance Just Destroyed This Indiana Republican for Failing to Act on Redistricting
Tipsheet

Obama: I Didn't Realize How Nervous People Were About Terrorism Because I Don't Watch Enough Television


Kind of a weird statement from a guy who seems to learn quite a lot about world events by first hearing about them in the press, no?  Snark aside, this is 
Advertisement
an actual self-assessment from the President of the United States in the days after two major terrorist attacks killed dozens in Western cities. Extraordinary and damning:


This is a dangerously out-of-touch, cloistered "leader" -- the type of man who'd give a news-free speech on national security without mentioning the major, controversial steps he'd just taken to undermine national security.  Incidentally, the Times stealth-edited this highly newsy nugget, disappearing it down the memory hole.  I wonder why.  The paper says it was due to length constraints, but that excuse doesn't fly.  They ended up adding more words to the final version than they erased.  It's almost as if they're protecting a political ally.  Notice how nobody is claiming that O didn't say this, or that it's not newsworthy.  It just vanished, for reasons that are transparently bogus.  We have a president who has been wrong about ISIS at every turn, and whose administration is facing serious allegations that it ignored and cooked intelligence to fit their political narratives.  We have a president who thinks climate change is a more pressing national security matter than Islamist jihadi terrorism, which he takes great pains not to identify by name.  And we have a president who evidently needs CNN, MSNBC and Fox News to explain to him just how frightened normal people are by the notion of being shot or blown up by terrorists.  Does he 
Advertisement

Related:

ISIS NEW YORK TIMES
not read polls either?


That survey was in the field before San Bernardino.  Speaking of polling, here's the latest from Pew.  Allahpundit correctly calls this a public vote of no confidence:


Those are, by far, his worst marks ever in this series. Not to worry, though -- team Obama has a plan.  Is it a serious strategy shift (beyond revisiting their insane ban on vetting visa applicants' social media)? Nope. Pure optics:


We're in the very best of hands, America. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos