Kash Patel Becomes the Focus of Media Analysis They Consistently Get Wrong
How America Has Destroyed Its Democracy, Part Two: The Aristocracy of Merit
Three Congressional Missteps on Healthcare
Today’s Qualifications to Be President of the U.S.
Climate Alarmists Howl After EPA Rescinds ‘Endangerment Finding’
Ukraine's Bureaucrats Are Finishing What China Started
Rising Federal Debt: Why Strategic Planning Matters More Than Ever for High-Net-Worth Fami...
Classroom Political Activism Shifts a Teacher’s Role from Educator to Indoctrinator
As America Celebrates 250, We Must Help Iran Celebrate Another 2,500
Guatemalan Citizen Admits Using Stolen Identity to Obtain Custody of Teen Migrant
Oregon-Based Utility PacifiCorp Settles for $575M Over Six Devastating Wildfires
Armed Man Rammed Substation Near Las Vegas in Apparent Terror Plot Before Committing...
DOJ Moves to Strip U.S. Citizenship From Former North Miami Mayor Over Immigration...
DOJ Probes Three Michigan School Districts That Allegedly Teach Gender Ideology
5th Circuit Vacates Ruling That Blocked Louisiana's Mandate to Display 10 Commandments in...
Tipsheet

Obama: I Didn't Realize How Nervous People Were About Terrorism Because I Don't Watch Enough Television

Obama: I Didn't Realize How Nervous People Were About Terrorism Because I Don't Watch Enough Television

Kind of a weird statement from a guy who seems to learn quite a lot about world events by first hearing about them in the press, no?  Snark aside, this is 
Advertisement
an actual self-assessment from the President of the United States in the days after two major terrorist attacks killed dozens in Western cities. Extraordinary and damning:


This is a dangerously out-of-touch, cloistered "leader" -- the type of man who'd give a news-free speech on national security without mentioning the major, controversial steps he'd just taken to undermine national security.  Incidentally, the Times stealth-edited this highly newsy nugget, disappearing it down the memory hole.  I wonder why.  The paper says it was due to length constraints, but that excuse doesn't fly.  They ended up adding more words to the final version than they erased.  It's almost as if they're protecting a political ally.  Notice how nobody is claiming that O didn't say this, or that it's not newsworthy.  It just vanished, for reasons that are transparently bogus.  We have a president who has been wrong about ISIS at every turn, and whose administration is facing serious allegations that it ignored and cooked intelligence to fit their political narratives.  We have a president who thinks climate change is a more pressing national security matter than Islamist jihadi terrorism, which he takes great pains not to identify by name.  And we have a president who evidently needs CNN, MSNBC and Fox News to explain to him just how frightened normal people are by the notion of being shot or blown up by terrorists.  Does he 
Advertisement

Related:

ISIS NEW YORK TIMES
not read polls either?


That survey was in the field before San Bernardino.  Speaking of polling, here's the latest from Pew.  Allahpundit correctly calls this a public vote of no confidence:


Those are, by far, his worst marks ever in this series. Not to worry, though -- team Obama has a plan.  Is it a serious strategy shift (beyond revisiting their insane ban on vetting visa applicants' social media)? Nope. Pure optics:


We're in the very best of hands, America. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement