CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and One Said the Quiet...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
This GOP Governor Just Shot Down a Bill That Would Have Banned Biological...
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
While Her Senate Rivals Campaign Statewide, Haley Stevens Hides From Voters
Delaware Smacked Down for Trying to Enforce Law, Ignoring Injunction
Dow 50,000: A Supply-Side Miracle
Tensions Rise At the White House's New Religious Liberty Commission as One Member...
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Even Jimmy Kimmel Is Mocking the Left for Their Sudden Love of Bad...
Even CNN Knows That Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of the Voter...
Ken Paxton Notches Immigration Win As Premier Community for Illegals Pays Out $68...
This Congressman's Inquiry Into Bad Bunny's Explicit Performance Has the Libs Screaming
Tipsheet

New HHS "Cost-Reducing" Regulations Could Actually Hike Premiums

On Monday, we told you about Kathleen Sebelius' new HHS regulation, which instructs private health insurers how they must spend their money and render their services.  I warned about the negative Massachusetts precedent, which has already demonstrated how tight government control leads to bruising legal battles and an ever more intrusive State.  The endgame, I suspect, is putting the entire private industry out of business, which has long been a fantasy of the Left.
Advertisement


As a more immediate concern, Reason's Peter Suderman raises another objection to HHS' edict: While purporting to reduce healthcare costs, it could very well end up increasing them:

If anything, mandatory MLRs encourage health insurers to drive overall spending upwards: Because profits and administrative costs will be limited to a small portion of each premium dollar, they end up tied to spending on medical services. So if an insurance company wants to expand the pool of potential profit dollars, one easy way to do that is by increasing spending on medical services and thus increasing premiums. And with some administrative cost-saving activities limited as well, that will be even easier.

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius says the rules "guarantee that consumers get the most out of their premium dollars." I’m not sure they guarantee much of anything, but a better bet is that they’ll result in insurers getting more premium dollars out of consumers.

Advertisement

Related:

HEALTH CARE

 
Depending on how you view this entire process, this is either a nasty unintended consequence of Obamacare, or a nasty, entirely intended consequence of the law.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos