John Thune Fumes After Getting Roasted by Karoline Leavitt Over His Incompetence
Oh, So That Explains These Wild Paragraphs About Caitlin Clark in That USA...
The Left-Wing Unicorn Hunt for the White Male Working-Class Voter
WisDems File a Lawsuit to Allow Absentee Voters to Cast a New Ballot
More Evidence How Facts Are Not Proof for the Press; Caitlin Clark's Fouls...
There's a Hidden Left-Wing Network Powering the 'Conservative' Rebellion Against Data Cent...
The Opposite of Diversity Is University
Mamdani Makes It Clear He Believes International Law Trumps US Sovereignty
The AP Blames US Aid Cuts for the Plight of Trans Sex Workers...
Trump: Iran Will Pay for Ship Damage With Its Own Frozen Funds
Massachusetts Woman Charged in $10 Million Ponzi Scheme That Burned 200 Investors
Trump Cracks Jokes, Reveals 'Little Bet' During Dodgers White House Visit
Oklahoma Chiropractor Convicted in $30 Million Medicare Fraud Scheme
Spanberger's Virginia Allowed Another Illegal Alien to Assault and Murder a Child
Mexican National Sentenced for Orchestrating Fake Robberies to Score U-Visas
Tipsheet

Federal Agency: The Term “Redskins” is a “Derogatory Slang”

Federal Agency: The Term “Redskins” is a “Derogatory Slang”

A company applying for a trademark to name their product “Redskins Hog Rinds” has been turned down by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Why? Because the federal agency considers the term to be offensive and derogatory:

Advertisement

There will be no trademark for “Redskins Hog Rinds,” a bad omen for the Washington Redskins in the legal battle over their name.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected a request from a company to sell pork rinds using the word “Redskins” because it deemed the term to be “derogatory slang.”

In a letter dated Dec. 29, the agency wrote: “Registration is refused because the applied-for mark REDSKINS HOG RINDS consists of or includes matter which may disparage or bring into contempt or disrepute persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols.”

The same agency is deliberating whether to revoke the trademark protection for the NFL team, part of a long-running challenge from a group of Native Americans. A hearing was held in March, and a decision is expected soon.

The Washington Post explains what might happen if the USPTO rules against the professional football team:

Advertisement

If the board rules against the Washington Redskins, the team wouldn’t be forced to change its name but would lose its registered trademark status, which helps protect it from individuals looking to sell merchandise with the word on it.

In other words, anyone could put the word “Redskins” on a product, distribute it, and make money at the team’s expense. That would undoubtedly affect the organization’s bottom line. And given the Redskin’s less-than-impressive season last year, that’s probably the last thing they want to let happen.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement