Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
While Homeless New Yorkers Freeze, the NYT Wants Us to Know This About...
Sen. Warren Repeats Debunked Lie About Women and the SAVE Act
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
Steve Hilton Isn’t Governor Yet, and He’s Already Exposing California Welfare Fraud
Tipsheet

Federal Agency: The Term “Redskins” is a “Derogatory Slang”

A company applying for a trademark to name their product “Redskins Hog Rinds” has been turned down by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Why? Because the federal agency considers the term to be offensive and derogatory:

Advertisement

There will be no trademark for “Redskins Hog Rinds,” a bad omen for the Washington Redskins in the legal battle over their name.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected a request from a company to sell pork rinds using the word “Redskins” because it deemed the term to be “derogatory slang.”

In a letter dated Dec. 29, the agency wrote: “Registration is refused because the applied-for mark REDSKINS HOG RINDS consists of or includes matter which may disparage or bring into contempt or disrepute persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols.”

The same agency is deliberating whether to revoke the trademark protection for the NFL team, part of a long-running challenge from a group of Native Americans. A hearing was held in March, and a decision is expected soon.

The Washington Post explains what might happen if the USPTO rules against the professional football team:

Advertisement

If the board rules against the Washington Redskins, the team wouldn’t be forced to change its name but would lose its registered trademark status, which helps protect it from individuals looking to sell merchandise with the word on it.

In other words, anyone could put the word “Redskins” on a product, distribute it, and make money at the team’s expense. That would undoubtedly affect the organization’s bottom line. And given the Redskin’s less-than-impressive season last year, that’s probably the last thing they want to let happen.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos