Standoff: Active Shooter in Texas Leaves One Dead, 11 Wounded; UPDATE: Suspect Dead
Elon Musk Just Became the World's First Trillionaire and the Socialists Are Already...
Vice President JD Vance Blasts 'Leaked' Iran Deal, Says Final Agreement Will Lead...
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna to Officially File to Void President Trump's First Impeachment
Former DNI Tulsi Gabbard Says American Taxpayers Funded Over 120 Biolabs Across the...
Your 'America First' Congresswoman Is Now Doing Propaganda For Russia
Steve Hilton Reveals Who's Really Responsible for the Thousands of Missing Migrant Childre...
Elon Musk Reflects on SpaceX’s Wild Rise As His Company Goes Public
President Trump Just Blew a Hole in Iran's Alleged Leaked Deal
Questions Are Emerging After Thousands of Los Angeles Ballots Were Apparently Rejected
Here's What Marco Rubio Had to Say About the UFC Fight For America's...
EXCLUSIVE: Illegal Alien Charged With Child Sexual Abuse Faces ICE Detainer
Dan Sullivan and GOP Officials Just Ended Democrats' Nefarious Plan in Alaska
Trump Reshares Comments From Top Iranian Official. Here's What He Said.
Trump Floats Total DC Takeover If This Happens Next Week
Tipsheet

Federal Agency: The Term “Redskins” is a “Derogatory Slang”

Federal Agency: The Term “Redskins” is a “Derogatory Slang”

A company applying for a trademark to name their product “Redskins Hog Rinds” has been turned down by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Why? Because the federal agency considers the term to be offensive and derogatory:

Advertisement

There will be no trademark for “Redskins Hog Rinds,” a bad omen for the Washington Redskins in the legal battle over their name.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected a request from a company to sell pork rinds using the word “Redskins” because it deemed the term to be “derogatory slang.”

In a letter dated Dec. 29, the agency wrote: “Registration is refused because the applied-for mark REDSKINS HOG RINDS consists of or includes matter which may disparage or bring into contempt or disrepute persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols.”

The same agency is deliberating whether to revoke the trademark protection for the NFL team, part of a long-running challenge from a group of Native Americans. A hearing was held in March, and a decision is expected soon.

The Washington Post explains what might happen if the USPTO rules against the professional football team:

Advertisement

If the board rules against the Washington Redskins, the team wouldn’t be forced to change its name but would lose its registered trademark status, which helps protect it from individuals looking to sell merchandise with the word on it.

In other words, anyone could put the word “Redskins” on a product, distribute it, and make money at the team’s expense. That would undoubtedly affect the organization’s bottom line. And given the Redskin’s less-than-impressive season last year, that’s probably the last thing they want to let happen.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement