Can JD Vance Be Present for Every White House Press Briefing? This Was...
Family Member of Woman Who Tried to Ram ICE Agents in Minneapolis Had...
Jimmy Kimmel's Rant About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis Shows Why Comedians Can't...
Senate Just Voted on a Resolution Limiting Trump's Ability to Approve Military Operations...
Minnesota Prosecutors Considering Murder Charge for ICE Agent
DOGE Just Updated Its Website. Here's How Much It's Saved.
Kicking Off the Year With Press Derangement, Contradictions, and Slanted Approaches to Sob...
Rep. Emily Randall Knows Who Congress Should Really Target for Fraud, and It's...
'Is Our Children Learning:' Check Out This Sign at the Domestic Terrorist Rally...
Ted Cruz Calls for Impeachment of Two Federal Judges Over ‘Constitutional Injury’
America First Lawmakers Must Punch Back As Europe Forces Importation of Harmful Regulation...
You Won't Believe What this Socialist CA Mayor Said About the Bondi Beach...
JD Vance Predicts a Rough Road for Democrats in 2028
ICE Agent Who Killed Woman After She Tried to Run Him Over Had...
Marriott Employee Fired After Allegedly Doxxing ICE Agents on Social Media
Tipsheet

Federal Agency: The Term “Redskins” is a “Derogatory Slang”

A company applying for a trademark to name their product “Redskins Hog Rinds” has been turned down by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Why? Because the federal agency considers the term to be offensive and derogatory:

Advertisement

There will be no trademark for “Redskins Hog Rinds,” a bad omen for the Washington Redskins in the legal battle over their name.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected a request from a company to sell pork rinds using the word “Redskins” because it deemed the term to be “derogatory slang.”

In a letter dated Dec. 29, the agency wrote: “Registration is refused because the applied-for mark REDSKINS HOG RINDS consists of or includes matter which may disparage or bring into contempt or disrepute persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols.”

The same agency is deliberating whether to revoke the trademark protection for the NFL team, part of a long-running challenge from a group of Native Americans. A hearing was held in March, and a decision is expected soon.

The Washington Post explains what might happen if the USPTO rules against the professional football team:

Advertisement

If the board rules against the Washington Redskins, the team wouldn’t be forced to change its name but would lose its registered trademark status, which helps protect it from individuals looking to sell merchandise with the word on it.

In other words, anyone could put the word “Redskins” on a product, distribute it, and make money at the team’s expense. That would undoubtedly affect the organization’s bottom line. And given the Redskin’s less-than-impressive season last year, that’s probably the last thing they want to let happen.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos