Men Are Going to Strike Back
Wait, That's Why Dems Are Scared About ICE Agents Wearing Body Cams
Bill Maher Had the Perfect Response to Billie Eilish's 'Stolen Land' Nonsense
Some Guy Wanted to Test Something at an Anti-ICE Rally. Their Reaction Says...
The Trump Team Quoted the Perfect TV Show to Defend a Proposed WH...
Why This Former CNN Reporter Saying He'd Fire Scott Jennings Is Amusing
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
Gold Medal Motherhood
TMZ's Halftime Show Poll Isn't Going the Way They Hoped
Bakari Sellers Says America Needs a 'Fumigation' of MAGA
Don Lemon Plays Civil Rights Martyr After Cities Church Mob Arrest
Canadian PM Carney Just Announced a Plan to Make Canadian Inflation Worse
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Tipsheet

New Defense Bill Exceeds Trump’s Request

In his interview with Christian Broadcast Network's Pat Robertson, President Trump mused that Russia would have been much happier if his opponent Hillary Clinton had won. She would have "depleted" the U.S. military, he said. Trump intends to build our defense, he said. The new National Defense Authorization Act that passed Friday suggests that he meant what he said.

Advertisement

The $696 billion bill, which passed in a vote of 344-81, will provide the military with more resources to produce more ships, aircraft, as well as allow for troop increases. In May, Trump proposed $603 billion in military build up, meaning Congress exceeded his expectations.

The House-passed NDAA bill would add 17,000 soldiers to the Army, something requested by the service but unfunded under the president's budget, as well as authorize purchase of four additional Navy ships, 17 more F-35 fighter jets, and eight more F/A-18 Super Hornet jets. The House bill is comprised of two sections, one that would authorize $631.6 billion in base defense spending, and $65 billion in overseas war spending.

As always, the NDAA didn't pass without some serious hurdles and controversies. For instance, conservatives were uncomfortable with an Obama-era provision that provided funding for transgender troops. 

Advertisement

Obama's "transgender decision is costly in dollars and short on common sense," Republicans like Rep. Vicky Vicky Hartzler (R-MO) argued, adding that if the provision remains, taxpayers will be subject to paying for transition surgeries and hormone treatments. However, the effort was defeated and the funding for transgender medical care remains in place.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement