It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

The EPA, West Virginia, and The Looming 20 Percent Hike In Energy Costs

The EPA, West Virginia, and The Looming 20 Percent Hike In Energy Costs

If there is one regulatory onslaught that is not really being talked about much on the campaign trail, or in the debates, it’s the Obama administration’s clean power plan. As I’ve written in other posts, it seems to unfairly impact states that voted for Romney in 2012, it places fixed-income seniors in dire financial straits, and puts a target on the back of rural America. No part of the country understands the looming burden than coal country.

Advertisement

Yesterday Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) questioned what amounts to a huge increase in the cost of living for over 400,000 people living in her state. Energy costs are projected to increase 20 percent, though the Environmental Protection Agency’s Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe, said the plan would decrease energy costs by seven percent for the average American:

Right now we have 430,000 low and middle income people in West Virginia who’s take home pay is $1,900 a month. They spend 17 percent of their take home money to pay for their energy,” Capito said. “When this goes up, say 20 percent, this is going to have a cost to them, a human cost to them.”

Capito also didn’t buy McCabe’s answers regarding the slight cost elevation to clean the atmosphere.

“I would take exception to that, if it goes up 20 percent and you’re bringing home $1,900. That’s a significant amount,” she said.

If states don’t have their plans that accommodate the goals of the EPA’s clean power plan, then a federal one will be implemented. Some governors are considering or openly stating they will refuse to comply with these burdensome new standards. In Minnesota, Republicans in the state House have sent a letter to state Attorney General Lori Swanson and Governor Mark Dayton–both Democrats–to challenge the EPA’s incoming regulations. Additionally, three Minnesota power companies have said they’re expecting to increase their rates since they rely on coal powered plants for electricity. The power plant regulations alone from the EPA have 300,000 jobs on the chopping block. It will also adversely affect black and Hispanics in the country, where millions of jobs could be gutted from these communities.

Advertisement

Also, the EPA and the Obama administration aren’t fooling anyone regarding electrical costs, they’re expecting them to go up, so the seven percent reduction talking point is just cute.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement