Although the “worried well” are still swamping emergency rooms, our pig flu is appearing to be a piglet. But a study in Science magazine claims the outbreak portends a pandemic and the media have gone hog wild over it. “Swine Flu Is as Severe as 1957 Pandemic,” blared a typical headline about the outbreak that killed 1-3 million people worldwide and 70,000 Americans.
Actually reading the study and its accompanying citations – rather than just the summary and press release, as most reporters do – shows that despite its the spin, it actually supports other data showing both that swine flu is less contagious and far less severe than ordinary seasonal flu.
Disease contagiousness is measured by its "basic reproductive rate," or the expected number of secondary infections from one person in a wholly susceptible population. The lower the rate, the less catchy the germ. Three different analyses in the Science article found rates of 1.4 to 1.6 based on epidemiological evidence, while when based on a genetic analysis of the virus showed a rate of 1.2.
After calculating a Mexico City rate of 1.5, essentially the same as the Science writers found, the director of Mexico’s National Center for Epidemiology and Disease Control told the Washington Post it’s “fairly low,” and “good news."
But the Science paper, prepared under the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO) – the planet’s chief Chicken Little – essentially says it’s bad news because the rate is “substantially higher” than that of seasonal flu.
Really?
Of the two citations the paper provides, one is by the lead author of the piece itself; the other finds a seasonal flu reproductive rate of 1.73 – above the findings for