NYT's Krugman Made an Economic Claim So Wild That Even Lefty Outlets Mocked...
The NYT Indirectly Exposes Something We've Known for Awhile About the COVID Vaccine
Notice the Glaring Error in This NYT Op-Ed About the War in Gaza?
If This Is True, Then Hamas Should Just Surrender
We Have Yet Another Example of Biden's Unearned Arrogance. And It's Devastating.
The People Who Know Biden Best Don’t Like Him
Steel Plant Falls in West Virginia, But No One Hears a Sound
Biden 2.0 -- Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid
It Might Be a Good Time to Start Investing in Bananas
The FBI's Crime Data Has Real Problems
Trump on Trial: Much Ado About Nothing
Joe Biden Sure Made Some Awkward Remarks About Kamala Harris
Is Stanley Meyer’s Dream Coming True?
The Misunderstood Entrepreneur
One Day, They'll Actually Miss Donald Trump
OPINION

The Left Hates Oil Companies

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

When oil prices blew sky high in 2008, ExxonMobil paid $36.5 billion in income taxes, $34.5 billion in sales taxes, and $45 billion in other taxes, for a total of $116.2 billion in taxes paid and collected in 2008.

Advertisement

That’s according to Mark Perry at the Carpe Diem blog.

Exxon will report earnings later this week. And while oil prices aren’t quite as high today as they were three years ago, it’s all a bit like 2008.

I read somewhere that either Exxon or the whole oil industry pays more in taxes than the bottom 50 percent of the whole income-tax system.

So while president Obama is out there ragging on oil companies to remove so-called tax subsidies, it’s odd that he doesn’t mention how much in taxes the energy firms actually pay to Uncle Sam.

There’s a laundry list of tax credits that go to oil, both large and small firms. Basically, these tax credits allow for the expensing of high-risk investment. That’s what this is about.

Of course, if you really wanted to stop expensive subsidies, you’d kill the ethanol subsidies that have a big carbon footprint and drive corn and wheat prices sky high.

But the liberal-left progressives hate oil and gas companies, period.

That’s really what all this is about.

Ironically, besides the usual plea for wind, solar, and biofuels -- which amount to virtually nothing in terms of our energy use -- the president does include natural gas. But natural gas is produced by oil and gas companies.

And you have to drill for it.

Therefore, oil expenses in the whole drilling process -- including leases, permits, geology research, and dry holes, and then drilling, producing, lifting, and ultimately refining for sale -- should be 100 percent expensed.

Advertisement

So it would be great if the president understood that you have to drill for natural gas.

It also would be great if the president and his pals, instead of harping on a measly $4 billion a year in so-called subsidies (compare that with a $1.5 trillion deficit), focused on real pro-growth corporate-tax reform that drops the rates and includes permanent 100 percent expensing.

That’s pro growth.

That’s tax reform.

That will create more oil, more natural gas, and more gasoline.

That would probably stabilize prices, assuming the Fed doesn’t totally destroy the dollar.

That would generate millions of new jobs and lower unemployment.

And that would be a good policy.

See also:

Larry Kudlow:  The Left Hates Oil Companies 
Dave Ramsey:  Dave Says No New Debt  
John Ransom:  It Tax a Village
Mike Shedlock:  More Retirement Worries
Ken Buck:  S&P Downgrade a Harbinger of Things to Come 


 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos