I accept your challenge, lose/lose proposition that it is.
I am also grateful for the chance to do so in print, what with the threat from my own state of Illinois that should Obama win, he will be under pressure from his senior senator, Dick Durbin, to control me and other radio talk show hosts with the return of the so-called Fairness Doctrine.
Your letter indicated that, as you have nanny-stater John Edwards in North Carolina and I have nanny-stater Barack Obama here in Illinois both running for president, we engage in a cross-country rivalry to see which of us can lose the biggest by having “our” candidate take the Democratic nomination or, God forbid, the White House. If I win, I lose. How Orwellian is that?
I will “win” this contest, with Obama besting Edwards not with better ideas, but with style. Edwards is an angry, well-manicured slap at the corporate lobby, while Obama is the smooth seducer, but the result of tangling with either would be the same regardless; America violated and broken in the morning.
They attack capitalism and the concept of individual responsibility and offer as a solution the protective benevolence of government life-management. They appeal to two groups of voters.
The first is the adult who can’t bring himself to suffer the public humiliation of moving back in with Mom, (I’m talking here about the ones that actually left home in the first place,) but faced with the reality of not being able to tie his own shoes, opts for having the government force us all to move into the basement with him.
The other is the person who thinks of herself as The Great and Wonderful Me. She knows how the world should operate. She knows what is fair. She knows that some people won life’s lottery and that everyone else is lucky, evil, or both. She is informed, caring and intelligent. Therefore, she knows that it is entirely reasonable to employ force in order to achieve what she knows to be equality. The only choice for her then is between the woman, the slap or the velvet mallet. But either way the choice will be right, as it will be made by The Great and Wonderful Me.
Both Edwards and Obama, as you point out, are the antithesis of freedom. What they both offer is a tunnel at the end of the light.
I laughed out loud (but not with any pleasure) when Elizabeth Edwards was introducing her husband for his New Hampshire wrap-up speech. She said, with no apparent irony, “You never get anything you don’t work for.”
How did the woman miss the entire theme of her husband’s campaign?
Contrast: David Cameron Suspends Vacation Over Foley Killing; Obama Heads Back To Vineyard | Christine Rousselle