KJP Previews Trump's Meeting With Biden at the White House
This is How Marco Rubio Responded to the Pro-Hamas Crowd
Trump Announces the New Ambassador to Israel
UPDATE: Judge Merchan Makes a Move on Whether to Toss Trump Case
Pack Your Bags, Mr. FBI Director
Illinois Files Intention to Appeal District Court Ruling on Gun Magazines
MSNBC Viewership Plummets After the Election
Liberal Women Are Stocking Up on Abortion Pills After Trump's Election Victory
Here's the Disturbing Reason Why Airlines Are Halting Flights to Haiti.
Why Hasn't Bob Casey Conceded Yet?
No, Republicans Didn't Win Because of 'Misinformation'
Fired FEMA Employee Spills the Beans on Discrimination Scandal
Chris Wallace Is Leaving CNN
Newsom Is Traveling to DC This Week. Here's Why.
It's Time for States to End Their Horrible Vote-Counting Systems and Adopt the...
OPINION

Fox Debate: Unfair and Unbalanced?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Twenty-four million people tuned in to watch the first primetime debate among 10 Republican presidential candidates. What were they expecting, a love-in?

Some conservative critics dumped on Fox News with a vitriol usually reserved for liberal media.

Advertisement

David Brody of the Christian Broadcasting Network said Fox (where I appear as a commentator) should be "utterly ashamed," calling the questions asked of Donald Trump "unethical and downright nasty."

"Shame" was a word frequently used by critics of Megyn Kelly, Bret Baier and Chris Wallace.

Rush Limbaugh was slightly more restrained. Limbaugh objected to the "war on women," question asked by Kelly of Donald Trump. Limbaugh said the "war on women" is a Democratic construct and is the kind of question one might expect from the "drive-by media," as he calls the rest of the journalistic pack.

Liberals, like New York Times columnist Frank Bruni, praised the questions asked by the panelists, which will likely further anger conservatives.

While every viewer probably had questions they wish had been asked, overall I thought the panel's choices were fine. The Baier question about whether all the candidates would support the nominee exposed Trump as something less than a party loyalist. He wouldn't say when he had become a Republican after many years as a Democrat and his contributions to Democratic politicians, including Hillary Clinton, which he said were necessary in order to do business in New York, might sound to some like influence-buying.

Alexandra Petri of the delightfully named Washington Post blog, Compost, wrote that Kelly's "God question" (from a Facebook participant) was not the kind "...that belong on a stage with this kind of stakes." Yes it does, because several of the candidates are openly Christian and often invoke religious language in support of their political positions. It was an appropriate question in 1976 for Jimmy Carter, who was open about his faith. And it was appropriate when reporter Fred Barnes asked Walter Mondale if he was a born-again Christian during his 1984 debate with President Reagan.

Advertisement

As one with some experience in responding to aggressive questioning from liberal TV and radio interrogators, here are some suggestions for the candidates should these questions come up again.

The real war on women is an economy that has left a record 93 million people out of the labor force; 56 million of these non-workers are women, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The war on women is also about the 56 million aborted babies who will never have a chance at life thanks to the lies Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers tell women about their babies. The candidate could praise alternative pregnancy help centers where women who have unplanned pregnancies receive help and support and those who have had abortions can experience healing.

A candidate might also respond to the "God question" by saying the belief that God favors America or Americans over other countries and people is idolatry. As the prophet Isaiah said, God sees all nations "like a drop in a bucket; they are regarded as dust on the scales" (Isaiah 40:15). That should cause candidates to reconsider Abraham Lincoln's line about it being more important that America is on God's side, than God being on America's side.

Jeb Bush did the best pivot of the evening. Asked about his role as the former director of the Bloomberg Family Foundation, a philanthropic organization headed by Michael Bloomberg, which has donated to Planned Parenthood, Bush said he was there to promote education and knew nothing about the company's contributions to other causes. He then detailed his pro-life record as Florida governor.

Advertisement

That's the way to respond. If the candidate doesn't like a question, deflect it and give an answer to a question that should have been asked.

Liberals praising the Fox panel should encourage panelists at the Democratic debates to follow that network's example and ask tough questions of those candidates, especially Hillary Clinton. But after eight years of the media mostly worshipping President Barack Obama, I'm doubtful that will happen.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos