Piers Morgan Interviews the Pro-Hamas Activist That Accosted Alec Baldwin. It's Totally In...
Police at UT Austin Had the Perfect Response to a Pro-Hamas Activist Flipping...
Secret Service Agent Assigned to Kamala Harris Suffers What Looks Like a Mental...
Here's the Video Exposing What NYU's Pro-Hamas Students Really Think
Will Jewish Voters Stop Voting For The Democrats Who Want To Kill Them?
Is Biden Serious With His Victory Lap on 'National Security'?
Someone Has to Be the Adult in the Room: Clear the Quad and...
Our Gallows Hill — The Latest Trump Witch Trial
Stop the 'Emergency Spending' Charade Already
Joe Biden’s Hitler Problem
Universities of America You Are Directly Responsible for the Rise of Jew Hatred...
The 'Belongers', Part II
Banning TikTok a Blow to Free Speech
Human Dreck
Border Crisis Solution - Forget Biden and Speaker Johnson
OPINION

Yeah; It's Different This Time

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Here they come, right on time. 

I’m referring to all the pundits who proclaim the power of the stock market.  It goes something like this:  If you had been wise enough to avoid the 2008 stock market crash, then obviously you would have been knowledgeable enough to hear the bell ring, which gave the “all clear” signal on March 6, 2009. 

Advertisement

In other words, you would have known that 3/6/09 was indeed a major bottom of the market, thus you would have fully deployed your money into stocks and ridden the Dow Jones gravy train upwards to the extent of approximately 8,000 points, receiving a very handsome gain of about 118%. 

And since your timing was proven to be so ideal, I’m certain that you also avoided the 2000 dot-com debacle. 

Hence, when all others were declaring the dot-com era as the new paradigm and 23-year-old CEOs with innovative internet ideas — backed by millions of dollars from Wall Street — were acting like the next Carnegie, Rockefeller, or Du Pont, you most certainly said, “Phooey, I’m not being suckered.” 

With that said, you definitely knew that the five-year period of 2003 to 2007 would produce over 50% on your money. 

Yes, it’s clear as a bell to all the money managers, financial talk show hosts, and financial columnists, that when you make your decisions in hindsight you’re usually 100% correct. 

These so-called experts will throw stones at those who look at the world and see difficult times, and just say it’s only a “wall of worry — stay invested.” 

They’ll also chide those investors who did enter the stock market in January of 2000 on their advice, only to be burned. 

Advertisement

Unfortunately, the very same investors said, “I’ll listen to you again,” and entered the stock market in 2008, only to be badly burned for a second time. 

Those that were seared will forget the past and simply say, “It’s different this time.” 

But had investors rolled the dice at the stock market top in 2000 and stayed the course, they would have realized a whopping 13.25 year return of 4.95% year-to-date — that’s 0.37% per year, obviously well worth the angst and aggravation. 

Incidentally, that’s not quite as good as Ben Bernanke’s current zero interest-rate policy (ZIRP), but it’s pretty darn close. 

Ahhh, stocks for the long run — gotta love ‘em — especially when the pundits are blowing their horn and you need to earn 4% on your investments per year in order to make ends meet.   

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos