Is This the Cringiest Kamala Harris Interview?
OnlyFans Star Claims Biden Administration Paid Her to Spread Propaganda
What Triggered Nancy Pelosi's Meltdown on MSNBC Yesterday
It's Time to Brutally Put Down These Pro-Hamas Punks on College Campuses
The Left Wants to Play Stupid Games
Behind The Scenes: FBI Surveillance And The Truth About Protest Monitoring
The Media Ignored the Anti-Biden Protest Votes Among Pennsylvania Democrats
Here's How Members of Congress Are Responding to Reports ICC May Issue Arrest...
Turkey Cannot Be a Mediator in the Gaza War
Joe Biden Says There Are Very Fine People on Both Sides of the...
Oversight Chair James Comer Is Right to Challenge Biden’s Bureaucratic Hiring Spree
Left-Wing Activists Are Controlling the Biden Administration
I've Never Needed to Perform an Abortion to Save a Woman's Life
Joe Biden’s Plot to Halt Innovation
Another Ivy League Says They're Suspending Pro-Hamas Students
OPINION

Supreme Court takes up IVF/benefits case

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
WASHINGTON (BP) -- The U.S. Supreme Court will rule if children conceived by in vitro fertilization following the death of their father can receive Social Security benefits.
Advertisement

The high court will decide if the Third Circuit Court of Appeals was correct in ruling that twins born four years after the death of their father qualify as his children under the Social Security law of the 1930s.

Robert Capato provided semen for deposit in a sperm bank in 1999. After he died of esophageal cancer in March 2002 while a resident of Florida, his widow, Karen, underwent in vitro fertilization with his sperm. She gave birth to twins in September 2003. She had conceived naturally and given birth to a son in 2001.

Karen Capato filed for survivors benefits on behalf of the twins, but the Social Security Administration rejected her claim. An administrative law judge also denied benefits, saying Florida law permits children to inherit personal property only if they are conceived before a parent's death. A federal judge in New Jersey agreed with that decision.

The Third Circuit, based in Philadelphia, Pa., overturned the lower court, ruling dependence on state law was not required in this case. According to the court of appeals, "the undisputed biological children of a deceased wage earner and his widow 'children' within the meaning" of the Social Security law.

Advertisement

Lawyers for the Obama administration urged the Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit decision and overturn it, pointing out it conflicts with a ruling by the Fourth Circuit. They said the Social Security Administration has received more than 100 applications for benefits by children conceived after parental deaths, according to Bloomberg News. That number has grown markedly in recent years, they said.

The justices, who announced Nov. 14 they had accepted the appeal, are expected to rule in the case before their term ends next summer.

Compiled by Tom Strode, Washington bureau chief of Baptist Press.

Get Baptist Press headlines and breaking news on Twitter (@BaptistPress), Facebook (Facebook.com/BaptistPress) and in your email (baptistpress.com/SubscribeBP.asp).

Copyright (c) 2011 Southern Baptist Convention, Baptist Press www.BPNews.net

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos