Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Paul Jacob :: Townhall.com Columnist
Making the world safe for . . . politicians
by Paul Jacob
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Congress pass Obamacare by the end of the year?

Doug Guetzloe is a threat. Since threats must be confronted, contained, or extinguished, people like Guetzloe must be locked away from law-abiding folk.

That, I guess, is the reasoning behind why Mr. Guetzloe was sentenced to jail.

But Guetzloe (pronounced “get-slow”), an Orlando, Florida, anti-tax activist and talk show host, is not a thief, a rapist or a murderer. He doesn’t appear to be any physical or financial threat to you or me, nor to most of his fellow Sunshine Staters.

He is, however, a threat to certain Florida politicians.

In 2006, Citizen Guetzloe premeditatedly communicated with thousands of his fellow citizens by mailing a police report involving David C. Strong, then a candidate for mayor, to approximately 4,000 Winter Park residents. The mailing contained some additional editorial comment, but there was no call to vote for or against any candidate — not that that should matter, of course.

The police report detailed a 1999 criminal complaint against Strong for battery. Apparently upset over his neighbor’s dog defecating in his yard, Strong invited the dog’s owner across the street, picked up the feces and smeared it on his neighbor. (This is the sort of person who seeks a leadership position in government?)

Strong won the election, of course, though no doubt by a thinner margin than he would have had residents not learned about the incident. As for his criminal case, Strong hardly got a slap on the wrist, having to perform 40 hours of community service, take anger management classes, have no contact with the victim, pay supervision costs, and be evaluated for substance abuse.

On the other hand, for having the temerity to distribute a public report publicly, a document that every citizen has a right to view, State Attorney Lawson Lamar charged Guetzloe with 14 counts of violating Florida’s campaign finance laws, which require a disclaimer — “Paid electioneering communication paid for by (Name and address of person paying for the communication)” — on any electioneering communication.

Believing he would pay a small fine and ultimately not even have a conviction on his record, Guetzloe pled “no contest.” Instead, Judge C. Jeffrey Arnold sentenced him to 60 days in jail, $8,500 in fines, and three years supervised probation. All for the crime of spreading around his opinion without following all the byzantine rules and regulations enacted into law by incumbent politicians.

Frankly, it could have been worse. Guetzloe was charged with 14 counts, but could have been charged with 4,000 — one for each recipient of the “un-disclaimed” material. The maximum penalty for each misdemeanor offense is one year in jail and a $1,000 fine. So, perhaps Guetzloe is lucky he’s not spending the rest of his life in prison . . . or 4,000 years, whichever might come first.

Candidates and groups with money and power seem able to navigate campaign finance laws well enough. Money rents the lawyers and accountants; power buys the special favors. And, with enough money, those big fines don’t seem so big.

But not so for the rest of us. Not so for Doug Guetzloe. He’s already spent more than $100,000 in his defense.

Guetzloe appealed his conviction on constitutional grounds, that the law violated his First Amendment rights, and argued that the 14 charges should lawfully only be one, since it was one mailing, not 14.

Florida’s 5th District Court of Appeals threw out 13 of the charges, agreeing that if there were a crime, it was just one crime — not 14 or 4,000. But while the appeals court vacated Guetzloe’s sentence and remanded the case back to the local court for re-sentencing, it upheld the law requiring that each mailpiece carry a disclaimer as a “paid electioneering communication.” Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Paul Jacob is President of Citizens in Charge. His daily Common Sense commentary appears on the Web, via e-mail, and on radio stations across America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
The Question is, "Was he Electioneering"
Based on the story as presented here, it seems to me the real question is not, "did he violate the Florida laws regarding electioneering," BUT, why was he prosecuted at all!!!!!!??????

If we are allowed to circulate our positions as part of free speech, & so long as he did not advocate for or against anyone in the election race, "what was his crime?"

All he did was inform the populace of the public record of an individual. He sought no vote for or against that person. He was paid nothing for his efforts. He was not a member of any campaign. In short, he expressed an opinion by informing folks about an issue that is a matter of public record.

Sorry, but my fight would be, where is the crime? You cannot stop me from speaking out and especially if I gain nothing by doing so. Plus, what is the crime that prohibits me from advising people about an individual, that is already a matter of public record?

It seems to me this man is a victim of malicious prosecution, perhaps by over zealous individuals, who may be paying favor to some elected official!

I say, this guy is the victim, not the criminal!

Participation
Another example of those in politics who want you to participate, so long as your actions support their positions.
If you do not support what they want, they have the ability & connections to make sure "the system" gets you!
The penalties imposed on this man, defy the rights of free speech, but are also draconian in that they impose excessively harsh financial penalties & excessively harsh incarceration penalties.
This man did not get enough posters out so more voters knew what kind of person they were electing to represent them. I believe had they known fully what kind of person he is, they would have voted him out of office.
The "pamphleteer" deserves to be lauded for his efforts to inform the voting public, not prosecuted for details of laws designed to limit or discourage voter participation.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.