You Won’t Believe Who Just Cheered Iran’s Islamic Revolution
OpenAI Fires Executive Who Warned About 'Adult Mode'
Axios Is Having a Tough Go of Things This Week, and Media Are...
In Defense of Female Inmates
Canada's MAiD Program Is About to Get Even More Horrifying
Backlash Grows Over the University of Notre Dame's Appointment of Pro-Abortion Professor
Megyn Kelly’s Moral Blind Spot: Refusing to Condemn Candace Owens
Democrat Ohio Senate Hopeful Sherrod Brown Supports an AG Candidate Who Vowed to...
California Campaign Adviser Sentenced to 48 Months in PRC Agent Case
19 New York City Residents Reportedly Freeze to Death After Mamdani Changes Homeless...
Colorado Woman Allegedly Billed $400K to Medicaid for Family’s Phantom Medical Rides
Philadelphia Men Allegedly Used ChatGPT to Scam Minnesota Out of $3.5M
Queens Duo Charged in Alleged Decade-Long $120 Million Medicare Scam
White House Blasts Washington Post Over ‘Breaking’ Story Trump Announced Last Year
‘Customer Has Spoken’: Ford Motor Company Faces $11 Billion Hit on EV Investments
Tipsheet

The Most Ridiculous Lawsuit of the Month - The "Flippin' the Birds" Edition

A few years ago, a group of five peacocks mysteriously arrived in a Michigan neighborhood.  No one has ever found where the birds came from, but 80 members of the community recently signed a petition to let them stay.  Why the petition now, after years of peaceful squatting?  It’s in response to a lawsuit filed by a resident who thinks the birds are a nuisance that have created “dangerous, offensive, or hazardous conditions.”

Advertisement

The suit accuses a local wildlife rescue organization of feeding the birds and sheltering them during the harsh Michigan winters, which the birds would supposedly not be able to survive otherwise.  The rescue group responds that they do occasionally feed the birds (as do most of the people in the neighborhood) but do not provide them any shelter, and the peacocks simply roost with native species during the colder months.

Animal control officers have put out traps for the birds but so far haven’t caught any, so the plaintiff now wants to force the wildlife rescue group to remove the birds.  Oh yeah, and they want monetary damages too.

The Michigan Department of Natural Resources obviously doesn’t consider the peacock an indigenous species, but it does have a list of 29 other birds native to the state that can pose as much of a nuisance threat as the peacock, none of which are mentioned in the plaintiffs’ suit (so far).  They also have a list of hardier animals like cougar, moose, and badgers (oddly enough, the famous Michigan wolverine isn’t named – maybe the “dangerous” peacocks scared them off?)

So is this the most ridiculous lawsuit of the month?  Or is it one of these instead:

Advertisement

·         the woman suing the maker of her K-cup coffee pods, alleging that the product is not “fresh” and “delicious” as advertised

·         the man suing a grocer for $15,000 after he pricked his finger on a rose’s thorn

·         the Arkansas couple claiming that seismic activity was caused by fracking process

·         the woman who hired a lawyer to sue over false advertising claims before she actually bought the product

Vote at FacesOfLawsuitAbuse.org!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement