Chris Cuomo Had a Former Leftist Call in to His Show. He Clearly...
This Town Filled Its Coffers With a Traffic Shakedown Scheme – Now They...
Planned Parenthood: Infants Not 'Conscious Beings' and Unlikely to Feel Pain
Democrats Boycotting OpenAI Over Support for Trump
Roy Cooper Dodges Tough Questions About His Deadly Soft-on-Crime Policies
Axios Is Back With Another Ridiculous Anti-Trump Headline
In Historic Deregulatory Move, Trump Officially Revokes Obama-Era Endangerment Finding
Sen. Bernie Moreno Just Exposed Keith Ellison's Open Borders Hypocrisy
Another Career Criminal Killed a Beloved Figure Skating Coach in St. Louis
Colorado Democrats Want to Trample First, Second Amendments With Latest Bill
White House Religious Liberty Commission Member Removed After Hijacking Antisemitism Heari...
Federal Judge Blocks Pete Hegseth From Reducing Sen. Mark Kelly's Pay Over 'Seditious...
AG Pam Bondi Vows to Prosecute Threats Against Lawmakers, Even Across Party Lines
Senate Hearing Erupts After Josh Hawley Lays Out Why Keith Ellison Belongs in...
2 Pakistani Nationals Charged in $10M Medicare Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet
Premium

California's New 'Equity' Speed Cameras Means Higher Fines for Non-Low-Income Drivers

California's New 'Equity' Speed Cameras Means Higher Fines for Non-Low-Income Drivers
AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli

In a move raising eyebrows across California, the state has rolled out "equity" speed cameras in San Francisco, where speeding fines now vary based on a driver's income. Under this new system, low-income drivers may only pay as little as $5 for a traffic violation, while wealthier individuals could face penalties as high as $500. Critics see it as another example of government overreach and misguided policies that penalize those who work hard and pay their fair share. Rather than addressing the root causes of speeding and unsafe driving, this system punishes drivers based on their financial status, creating more division and resentment in the process. 

San Francisco has officially activated 33 newly installed speed cameras across the city to curb speeding and improve road safety. Although drivers will not receive citations during the initial two-month grace period, fines will soon be issued based on the severity of the violation and the driver's income level. 

Fines will range from $10 to $500, with the amount varying depending on the driver's financial situation. For example, drivers caught exceeding the speed limit by 11 to 15 miles per hour typically face a $50 fine, but those deemed "low-income" will pay $25, and those receiving "public assistance" will pay just $10. Similarly, drivers caught speeding between 16 and 25 miles per hour over the limit will usually be fined $100, while "low-income" drivers will pay $50, and those on "public assistance" will be charged $20. The penalty for speeding by 26 miles per hour or more will usually be $200, but it will be reduced to $100 for low-income drivers and $40 for those on public assistance.

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) projects that approximately 42,000 citations will be issued daily under the new speed camera program.

However, some critics believe the new traffic cameras are unfair to those who make a good living. 

“How does that square with letting some people largely off the hook for their offenses?” An opinion piece in the Staten Island Advance asked. "It doesn’t. In fact, it might encourage some people to keep speeding,” the article added. “And it shows that only some of us, people of means, are responsible for safer roads. As if people with middle-class incomes don’t already pay their fair share, and more, to the government in the form of an entire constellation of taxes and fees.” 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos