Don't Play Their Game
House Republicans Want to Know Why Ilhan Omar's Income Jumped by 140 Percent...
UN Report Says One of the Deadliest Threats to US National Security Is...
Here's What Trump Had to Say About That Olympic Athlete Who Bashed His...
Historic: U.S. Marks Ninth Month With Zero Releases at the Border
'Brass-Knuckled Hypocrisy:' Even the Washington Post Is Slamming Virginia Democrats' Redis...
This Viral Super Bowl Halftime Story About Bad Bunny's Grammy Was Completely False
John Kasich Called Bad Bunny's Show a Celebration of Latino Culture. Did He...
Senator Eric Schmitt Goes Nuclear on Dems Over ICE Funding, Immigration, and the...
Check Out How the Media Portrayed Japan's Conservative Party's Big Election Win
Jonathan Turley Wrecks Jamelle Bouie for His Despicable Attack on Vance's Mom
Here Is the Real Reason Bad Bunny Is Anti-American
We Didn't Think Progressives Could Make LA Any Worse, but They Can
Don Lemon Defends Bad Bunny's Halftime Show While Admitting He Had No Idea...
'The President’s Plan Is Working,' Scott Bessent Predicts a Booming Economy in 2026
Tipsheet

Pete Hegseth Shakes Up the Military Again

AP Photo/Virginia Mayo

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has wasted no time shaking up the military since joining the Trump administration, bringing a no-nonsense, mission-first approach to the Pentagon. In his latest move, Hegseth ordered a 60-day review of military combat arms standards to ensure no exceptions are being made for female troops to enter physically demanding roles within the branches. Hegseth has committed to ensuring combat readiness over political correctness and reinforces the idea that the U.S. military should be held to the same rigorous standards regardless of gender. 

Advertisement

On Monday, Hegseth issued a memo ordering both men and women to be held to the same physical standards if they want to serve in combat roles. He argued that the Pentagon had allowed “standards to slip” since 2016, when combat roles were first opened to women. 

“For far too long, we have allowed standards to slip. We’ve had different standards for men/women serving in combat arms [Military Occupational Specialty] MOS’s and jobs…. That’s not acceptable, and it changes right now!” Hegseth said in an X post. 

In his memo, Hegseth requires a redefinition of combat arms occupations and non-combat roles, listing three military specialties “which require heightened entry-level and sustained physical fitness.” For ground combat, physical standards that must be met include the “ability to carry heavy loads, endure prolonged physical exertion, and perform effectively in austere, hostile environments.”

Meanwhile, the standards for special operations forces are “advanced swimming, climbing, parachuting, and the ability to operate in extreme environments.” This also includes “sustained peak physical performance.”

The memo states that future standards must ensure no current service member is held to a lower standard.

Advertisement

Related:

PETE HEGSETH

“All entry-level and sustained physical fitness requirements within combat arms positions must be sex-neutral, based solely on the operational demands of the occupation and the readiness needed to confront any adversary,” Hegseth continued. 

Service secretaries will have 60 days to submit their proposed combat-role standards. Military branches will then be required to implement the changes within six months. 

According to a 2022 Rand study, 65 percent of women failed the Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT). This prompted the U.S. Army to make different standards for men and women. Females were also allowed to re-test during the Army Ranger school’s “RAP week.” 

Due to the intense physical capabilities of combat military roles, men and women must be held to the same standard. Lowering standards for females can compromise military effectiveness and put lives at risk. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement