What the Pro-Hamas Crowd Doesn't Get and Never Will
Do Any Real People Give A Single Damn About January 6th? (And Other...
Don't Nuke the Senate Filibuster!
Vote Buying, Biden Style
Mainstream Media’s Disinformation Is To Die For
The Selective Outrage of Pro-Hamas Supporters
Americans Have Become Second Class Citizens Under the Biden-Harris Administration
Kamala’s Capital Gains Tax Surprise
It's All Too Much for Me to Take
Javier Milei: Bookworm and Genius of Self-Marketing
Hostages, Failures, and a Political Reckoning
Reflections on Israeli Gun Control: Lessons for America on the Eve of the...
Biden Claims Border Crossings Are Down, but He’s Just Flying Them in Now
If Crime Is Your Top Concern, Vote Trump.
Hideously Inept Federal Disaster Response for Hurricane Helene – How it Should Have...
Tipsheet

'Ideological Zealot': Sen. Cotton Offers Blistering Criticism of Special Counsel Jack Smith

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

On Tuesday, as Spencer covered, former and potentially future President Donald Trump was indicted for the third time by a D.C,-based grand jury, as Special Counsel Jack Smith brought charges to do with the events on and leading up to January 6, 2021. The charges earned considerable criticism, with Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) earning attention for his particularly harsh words during his appearance on Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle."

Advertisement

After having "skimmed through" the indictment, Cotton said he agreed with host Laura Ingraham's categorizing the indictment "a diatribe." He also explained that "it seems like something you would get from an MSNBC producer for a special on that channel. These are all constitutionally protected activities in which former President Trump engaged, political activities and free speech protected by the First Amendment."

Adding that "you don't have to agree with him, you don't have to think he was right," Cotton also noted "I don't see how these charges can go forward without a serious constitutional challenge from the former president."

Cotton had strong words not only for the charges, but for Smith as well, referring to him as "an ideological zealot" and calling to mind how he charged former Gov. Bob McDonnell (R-VA) on similar crimes in 2014. As the senator pointed out, though, those charges were reversed unanimously at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016, "because his legal theories were so far-fetched."

On Wednesday, McDonnell lambasted Smith's legal history as one which shows the prosecutor to be "partisan," who "exercised bad judgment," and had an "overzealousness about charging." McDonnell himself had legal experience as the Attorney General of Virginia before his time as governor.

Advertisement

Cotton also said "it's very curious that [Attorney General] Merrick Garland chose that man," speaking about Smith, "to pursue the former president." 

Finally, Cotton wished to make a telling point about how Democrats react to Republicans winning elections. "I want to point out that every time a Republican has won the presidency in this century, the Democrats try to stop the certification of that victory. Yet none of them face criminal charges over what is obviously First Amendment protected activity," Cotton shared, raising further concerns about the nature of these charges.

Cotton was hardly the only one to raise First Amendment rights concerns about the charges against Trump. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) also earned attention for his comments, as has been the case whenever he's spoken out against the indictments brought against Trump. "Apparently it is now a crime to make statements challenging election results if a prosecutor decides those statements aren’t true," his tweet pointed out.

Advertisement

"So when should we expect indictments of the democrat politicians who falsely claimed Russia hacked the 2016 election," Rubio's tweet also asked. The Russia collusion narrative that Rubio referred to was confirmed to be a total hoax by the Durham report released in May of this year. 

As another tweet from Rubio on Wednesday pointed out, even Hollywood actors put forth a desperate, last-ditch to get the 2016 election results overturned. "When will the investigation begin on the effort by Hollywood actors to overturn the Presidential Election of 2016," Rubio's subsequent tweet asked. 

And yet another tweet, this one pinned to his profile, contains a clip of over 2 minutes long of people pushing the Russia collusion hoax, as it too asks when those people will be indicted.

Advertisement



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement