Why the Associated Press Was Blocked From Trump's Oval Office Event Yesterday
Bill Maher Nails It With These Remarks About the NFL Removing This Slogan...
Women's Magazine Editor: Taylor Swift's Booing at the Super Bowl Was Beyond Chilling
GOP Rep Vows to Reveal All Top Federal Secrets
A CNN Host's Frustration Was Visible When His Anti-Elon Musk Talking Points Got...
Trump Kicking The Associated Press To The Curb Reinforces That America’s ‘New Golden...
The Biden Economic Hangover
Watch Marc Fogel's Reaction When He Met Trump Upon Returning to US
USAID Inspector General Fired
What's 'Unprecedented' and 'Extraordinary' About El Salvador's Offer to Take Deportees
It's Only a 'Crisis' When Republicans Try to Restrain Government
If You Really Support Immigration, Stop Excusing Chaos
Rubio Has it Right
The DOGE Bait and Switch
Half-Trans, Half-Free: Blue States Defy Trump
Tipsheet

Supreme Court to Hear 'Remain in Mexico' Case

AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib

On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it was taking up the "Remain in Mexico" case, after the Biden administration has appealed. The policy from the Trump administration requires those seeking asylum who come to the United States via the southern border to wait in Mexico for a hearing in the U.S. immigration court.

Advertisement

Upon taking office in January 2021, President Joe Biden quickly got to work getting rid of the policy, but a ruling last August from U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk in Texas upheld the policy. 

The Biden administration's version of the policy was implemented last December, as Julio highlighted from on the ground in Yuma, Arizona. 

The U.S. Supreme Court had also previously upheld "Remain in Mexico," last August after Judge Kacsmaryk's decision, but such an emergency docket decision was unsigned. This use of the shadow docket tactic has been particularly reviled by liberals. 

While SCOTUSblog and liberal news outlets such as CNN bemoan the policy as "controversial," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, both Republicans, were quick to celebrate. 

Advertisement

The Court will hear the case in April. Curt Levey, a constitutional law attorney and the president of the Committee for Justice took particular notice of the timing. "The Court clearly thought an expedited decision was warranted here because they squeezed a hearing into this term. The other way to expedite it would have been skipping oral argument and deciding the case on the shadow docket. Many on the left are disturbed by the Court's recent use of the shadow docket, but in most cases, it doesn't affect the substance of the ultimate outcome," Levey said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement