Court TV Absoluely Loses It Over Karmelo Anthony Verdict
Trump Claims 'Final Throes' Of Iran Deal As Missile Strikes Pause
JD Vance Just Took Huge Action Against Tim Walz and Keith Ellison
You Won't Believe What This Former Platner Staffer Said About His Campaign
The Niece of MLK Just Ripped Into the SPLC During Heated House Hearing
California Is Now Safe From the Policies of Tom Steyer
This Is What AOC Has to Say About Graham Platner's Abuse Allegations
Here's the Real Problem With California's Elections
NJ Moves to Criminalize Interference With Abortion and 'Gender-Affirming Care' Procedures
CENTCOM Announces Strikes Against Iranian Assets in Response to Downed Apache
'Secure America Act' Heads to President Trump's Desk, Funding ICE and CBP
Brandon Gill Goes Scorched Earth on SPLC President Brian Fair
Verdict Revealed in Karmelo Anthony Case
NJ Voter Rolls Exposed for Having Non-Citizens Unknowingly Registered to Vote
Iran Responds to Trump's Vow for Military Action After Army Helicopter Shot Down
Tipsheet

"Use It or Lose It" Loses

"Use It or Lose It" Loses

In an effort to pass some kind of energy bill before the 4th of July recess and having failed with their price gouging bill, the Democrats brought H.R. 6251 - the Responsible Federal Oil and Gas Lease Act sponsored by Rep. Rahall from West Virginia -- to the floor last week. The bill is also know as the "Use it or Lose it" bill.  
Advertisement


Not only does it do nothing to increase oil production, this bill prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from issuing new leases for exploration for, or production of, oil or natural gas, unless the applicant certifies that he is “diligently developing” the leased lands or surrenders the leases.   This bill would restrict the development of American energy, while sending a signal to the energy markets that petroleum had better come up quick or not at all, a move that could trigger higher energy prices and discourage investment in energy exploration.

19 Democrats joined 176 Republicans in defeating this "duplicate" piece of legislation. I say duplicate because Federal energy lease holders already must produce oil or natural gas within five to 10 years to live up to the terms of the lease and the law. 

Interestingly enough, back in 1992, Speaker Pelosi as well as Majority Leader Hoyer and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall (D-WV), author of the bill voted for the very duplicate provisions of the current lease structure.  According to Title 30, Subsection 188(a) and (b) of the United States Code, “any lease … may be forfeited and canceled … whenever the lessee fails to comply with any provisions of this chapter, of the lease, or of the general regulations…  Any lease … shall be subject to cancellation by the Secretary of the Interior after 30 days notice upon failure of the lessee to comply with any of the provisions of the lease.”  
Advertisement


So here we are in recess having left Washington, D.C. again without acting on any meaningful legislation to increase the supply of American-made energy to help lower gasoline prices. Now we know why Congress' approval rating is at 18%.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement