Sunny Hostin Complained About Lindsey Graham's Sister Becoming a U.S. Senator. Her Reason...
Trump Just Hammered This Democrat Governor for Banning AI Data Centers
After Shooting at Commercial Ships, Iran Threatens Total Shutdown of Middle East Exports
Nick Shirley and Ron Johnson Blow Lid Off Fraud Pipeline That Sent Cash...
Watch This Democrat Candidate Channel Drunken Cheerleader Energy in Cringeworthy Campaign...
Mamdani's Assault on the Truth Behind Rape Stats
Speaker Mike Johnson Warns the Communist Barbarians Are Inside the Gates
Jim Acosta Continues His Obsession With the Reflecting Pool
The UCSF Chancellor Just Admitted Its Transgender Clinic Harms Children
Elissa Slotkin Repeats This Insulting Lie About Married Women Supporting Democrats
A New Poll Shows Socialism Isn't As Popular As the Left Wants Us...
The Biggest Myth About AI Data Centers Just Fell Apart
New York Just Became the First State to Pass an AI Data Center...
Gay Couple Sues Surrogate Mother for Refusing to Abort Child Over Cleft Lip
Todd Blanche Is Testifying on Capital Hill Today. Here's What You've Missed.
Tipsheet

NPR's Fiasco With Their Samuel Alito Story Just Got Worse

NPR's Fiasco With Their Samuel Alito Story Just Got Worse
AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File

National Public Radio’s public relations fiasco is hilarious for many reasons, not least because they just can’t admit it. The outlet published yesterday that Justice Samuel Alito was retiring. Two issues: first, it would’ve been good to double-check with the Public Information Office; second, Nina Totenberg, who wrote the piece, knew she screwed up when no one was running with it, leading the Supreme Court PIO to call her out.

Advertisement

Alito is not retiring; they’re still in the rumor phase. It’s not a crime to pre-write the story, but Lord God, people, what the hell happened? They can’t say we were wrong, and it was published by accident. We get rationalizations and other excuses. No, sit there and be wrong.

Totenberg said she misheard retirement announcements from Chief Justice Roberts or something, which was the narrative for most of yesterday afternoon and evening. Now, we learn she was present for that part, despite going on All Things Considered to explain this trainwreck moment. They can’t even get the correction right—is this a simulation? 

Advertisement

Just a fiasco, and no one will be punished over this. Also, as you all know, this isn’t the first time Nina has been wrong, and it’s certainly not the first time she has allegedly made an error while rushing. She was fired in 1972 for plagiarism, claiming she was in a hurry and that it was a lapse in judgment. 

Advertisement

I also love how Mark Halperin, now being devoid of network ties, started off his segment about the error by saying Nina is liberal as hell. Not that we didn’t know, but ‘hey, maybe this error happened because Nina, like most in the SCOTUS press corps, hates the conservative wing.’ 

Maybe that's why they can't even get the correction right. What a circus. 

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos