We Had Update in the Nancy Guthrie Case...Don't Get Too Excited
Nancy Mace Isn't Handling Her Crushing Defeat in the SC Primary Well
Standoff: Active Shooter in Texas Leaves One Dead, 11 Wounded; UPDATE: Suspect Dead
The ACLJ and Nearly 30 Organizations Are Defending a Pregnancy Resource Center Against...
California Dems Say You Can't Watch the World Cup If You Hate DEI
It Isn't Over. Spencer Pratt Just Declared War.
Elon Musk Just Became the World's First Trillionaire and the Socialists Are Already...
Vice President JD Vance Blasts 'Leaked' Iran Deal, Says Final Agreement Will Lead...
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna to Officially File to Void President Trump's First Impeachment
Former DNI Tulsi Gabbard Says American Taxpayers Funded Over 120 Biolabs Across the...
Jamaican National Charged With Using Fake Marriage, Army Service to Fraudulently Obtain US...
John Cornyn Renews His Attention-Seeking Temper Tantrum
EXCLUSIVE: Illegal Alien Charged With Child Sexual Abuse Faces ICE Detainer
Dan Sullivan and GOP Officials Just Ended Democrats' Nefarious Plan in Alaska
Tipsheet

Judge Smacks Down Lefty Boomer's Lawsuit Over Trump's UFC Fight and Cites a Simple Reason

Judge Smacks Down Lefty Boomer's Lawsuit Over Trump's UFC Fight and Cites a Simple Reason
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

There has been a ton of Trump-deranged nonsense on the legal front—this one might take the cake, though it never got off the ground for many reasons, not least because it’s soaked in lunacy. President Donald Trump is holding a UFC fight on the White House grounds for America 250, and this lefty boomer couldn’t stand it, citing aesthetic issues or whatever. The judge dismissed it, noting that a) it was late, and b) there’s no evidence showing how this event would harm the plaintiffs (via NYT):

Advertisement

A federal judge on Friday declined to block the White House from holding cage fights on the South Lawn on President Trump’s birthday, just days before the Sunday event was set to take place.

Responding to a last-ditch emergency motion, Judge Amit P. Mehta wrote in a 15-page opinion that it was not clear that the two individuals who sued over the Ultimate Fighting Championship matches would be sufficiently harmed by the one-off event to give them legal standing to challenge it.

The two claimants had argued that the use of the White House and Lincoln Memorial as a backdrop for fights could provide an inappropriate financial benefit to the private company that arranged it. But Judge Mehta wrote that they failed to detail how their interests outweighed those of everyone involved in bringing the project to fruition.

The organizers, Judge Mehta wrote, “point to the near yearlong planning of the event; coordination with multiple government agencies, including the Secret Service; site work that began May 20 and has involved between 700 to 900 workers; multiple equipment deliveries; event ticketing logistics; and preparations of the contracted U.F.C. fighters.”

Advertisement

Nothing more needs to be said—sit down and shut up, you pathetic losers. 

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement