Merry Christmas, Over a Million More Files Potentially Related to the Epstein Case...
Supreme Court Ruled on Trump's Use of National Guard In This Blue State
These Street Preachers Shared the Gospel – Now They Might Face Charges
Another Left-Wing Judge Just Decided He's Got More Authority Than President Trump
Despite No Evidence, This USAID Cuts Narrative Has Taken Hold
'The President Can't Do Everything:' Sen. Kennedy Calls on Senate to Use Reconciliation
Australia Just Admitted the Truth: You Can’t Have ‘Multiculturalism’ and Free Speech
D.C. Police Officer Hospitalized After Being Struck by Motorist on I-695
Popular Neo-Nazi to Campaign Against Vivek Ramaswamy in Ohio Gubernatorial Race
Stephen Miller Blasts CBS for Sympathizing With Criminal Illegal Immigrants
Federal Judge Blocks California Policy Forcing Schools to Hide Gender Transitions From Par...
US Sanctions Five European's Behind the 'Global Censorship-Industrial Complex'
ICE Agents Fired at Incoming Van in Maryland
Federal Judge Rules That Michigan Cannot Disrupt International Line 5 Pipeline
Worcester Man Indicted for Allegedly Stealing $137K in COVID Rental Aid Using Stolen...
Tipsheet

It's Not Shocking That Wikipedia Had to Do This for the 'Gaza Genocide' Page

AP Photo/Doaa AlBaz

Should we be disturbed? Sure. Is it shocking? Sadly, no, since the Israel-Hamas War in Gaza has led to every antisemite coming out of the woodwork, especially in American academia. The Democratic Party’s base is now infected with these cancerous clowns, which has led to the party becoming increasingly anti-Israel and hostile to Jewish people.  

Advertisement

With antisemitism rising, the edit function on Wikipedia for articles about Gaza had to be shut down. It’s one of the website’s draws —a democratization of information, if you will. Well, if it’s being edited to spew outright hatred, expect these administrative measures to be taken (via NY Post): 

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales personally intervened to block the site’s users from editing a page titled “Gaza genocide” — sparking a controversy among the site’s editors as he called out the article and its introduction for presenting the allegation as a fact. 

The first sentence of the controversial entry refers to a “Gaza genocide” without attributing it to any sources, failing to indicate that it is an allegation that remains “highly contested” and instead portraying it as an undisputed fact, Wales wrote. 

“This article fails to meet our high standards and needs immediate attention,” Wales wrote, citing Wikipedia policies on neutrality and attribution to call out the biased tone of the “Gaza genocide” entry. 

“I believe that Wikipedia is at its best when we can have reasonable discussion rooted in a commitment to write articles that reflect a neutral point of view,” wrote Wales, whose current title is chair emeritus of the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation that oversees the free online encyclopedia. 

“I believe that’s especially important on highly difficult or contentious topics,” Wales added. “While this article is a particularly egregious example, there is much more work to do.” 

Advertisement

And that’s the downside of Wikipedia, too. You can get the crazies manning the controls. 

Editor's Note: Donald Trump is America's Peace Time President. Support and follow Townhall's latest reporting on the president's historic trip to the Middle East.

 Join 
Townhall VIP and use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos