Guess How Many Iranian Targets the US and Israel Hit Within 72 Hours
Supreme Court Ruling on California's Anti-Parental Rights Policy Regarding Trans-Identifie...
Guess Who's Promoting the Protests Against Iran Airstrikes
China Is Refusing to Help Iran Fight, but Is Offering This Instead
How Congress Can Protect MAHA — Without Hiking Grocery Bills
The Supreme Court Just Dealt a Massive Blow to California's Transgender Activist Policies
Russia Says It's Lost Contact With Iranian Nuclear Leadership
Don't Let Congress Ruin College Sports
Will Megyn Kelly Kindly Shut the Heck Up?
Gun Rights Group Points Out Iran as Example of Why 2A Is So...
Rep. Massie and Others Claim Israel Forced Our Hand. Here's Why That Isn't...
Why Success in Iran Could Win Republicans the Midterms
Saudi Arabia Is Preparing to Strike Iran
Soros-Backed Liberal Prosecutor to Drag the Heroes Who Ended Austin's Islamic Terror Attac...
U.S. Consulate in Dubai Set Ablaze After Possible Drone Attack
Tipsheet

It's Not Shocking That Wikipedia Had to Do This for the 'Gaza Genocide' Page

It's Not Shocking That Wikipedia Had to Do This for the 'Gaza Genocide' Page
AP Photo/Doaa AlBaz

Should we be disturbed? Sure. Is it shocking? Sadly, no, since the Israel-Hamas War in Gaza has led to every antisemite coming out of the woodwork, especially in American academia. The Democratic Party’s base is now infected with these cancerous clowns, which has led to the party becoming increasingly anti-Israel and hostile to Jewish people.  

Advertisement

With antisemitism rising, the edit function on Wikipedia for articles about Gaza had to be shut down. It’s one of the website’s draws —a democratization of information, if you will. Well, if it’s being edited to spew outright hatred, expect these administrative measures to be taken (via NY Post): 

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales personally intervened to block the site’s users from editing a page titled “Gaza genocide” — sparking a controversy among the site’s editors as he called out the article and its introduction for presenting the allegation as a fact. 

The first sentence of the controversial entry refers to a “Gaza genocide” without attributing it to any sources, failing to indicate that it is an allegation that remains “highly contested” and instead portraying it as an undisputed fact, Wales wrote. 

“This article fails to meet our high standards and needs immediate attention,” Wales wrote, citing Wikipedia policies on neutrality and attribution to call out the biased tone of the “Gaza genocide” entry. 

“I believe that Wikipedia is at its best when we can have reasonable discussion rooted in a commitment to write articles that reflect a neutral point of view,” wrote Wales, whose current title is chair emeritus of the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation that oversees the free online encyclopedia. 

“I believe that’s especially important on highly difficult or contentious topics,” Wales added. “While this article is a particularly egregious example, there is much more work to do.” 

Advertisement

And that’s the downside of Wikipedia, too. You can get the crazies manning the controls. 

Editor's Note: Donald Trump is America's Peace Time President. Support and follow Townhall's latest reporting on the president's historic trip to the Middle East.

 Join 
Townhall VIP and use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement