Red Pilling Is the Answer
No Way Adam Schiff Used That Phrase to Describe the Narco-Terrorists We're Blowing...
Jasmine Crockett Just Made a Huge Move–How Will It Pan Out?
State Attorney General Pressures City to Cancel Christmas-Themed Drag Show
Indiana University Sanctions Lecturer for Claiming MAGA Is White Supremacy
Top Trump Prosecutor Resigns After Appeals Court Ruling
Democrats Just Proposed Legislation to Make Plane Tickets More Expensive
Man of the People Mamdani to Move Into Swanky Gracie Mansion
President Trump Announces $12B in Farm Subsidies
Greenpeace Seeks to Undermine US Law in a Dutch Court
Tammy Baldwin's Obamacare Subsidy Olive Branch Backfires on Her
New Jersey City Buckles Under After Lawsuit Challenging Illegal Gun Confiscation
Some Cultures Shouldn't Be Welcomed in the US
Seattle to Host LGBTQ+ Pride Match For FIFA World Cup Featuring Egypt and...
Supreme Court Signals Support for Trump Admin in Landmark FTC Firing Case
Tipsheet

Even the Washington Post Supports Donald Trump's East Wing Project

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

President Trump’s East Wing project is so destructive of the norms that The Washington Post has defended it. The reason is simple: everyone admitted it needed to be done, and it’s an embarrassment that the White House never had a room large enough for proper state dinners and other events. The stories are infamous: guests are relegated to porta-johns and eating under tents. And yet, liberal America treated this as some desecration of the residence (via WaPo): 

Advertisement

The teardown of the White House’s East Wing this week is a Rorschach test. Many see the rubble as a metaphor for President Donald Trump’s reckless disregard of norms and the rule of law, a reflection of his willingness to bulldoze history and a temple to a second Gilded Age, paid for by corporate donors. Others see what they love about Trump: A lifelong builder boldly pursuing a grand vision, a change agent unafraid to decisively take on the status quo and a developer slashing through red tape that would stymie any normal politician. 

In classic Trump fashion, the president is pursuing a reasonable idea in the most jarring manner possible. Privately, many alumni of the Biden and Obama White Houses acknowledge the long-overdue need for an event space like what Trump is creating. It is absurd that tents need to be erected on the South Lawn for state dinners, and VIPs are forced to use porta-potties. 

The State Dining Room seats 140. The East Room seats about 200. Trump says the ballroom at the center of his 90,000-square-foot addition will accommodate 999 guests. The next Democratic president will be happy to have this. 

Preservationists express horror that Trump did not submit his plans to their scrutiny, but the truth is that this project would not have gotten done, certainly not during his term, if the president had gone through the traditional review process. The blueprints would have faced death by a thousand papercuts. 

[…]

The White House cannot simply be a museum to the past. Like America, it must evolve with the times to maintain its greatness. Strong leaders reject calcification. In that way, Trump’s undertaking is a shot across the bow at NIMBYs everywhere. 

Advertisement

Okay, so it’s settled, guys. This construction project is necessary and proper. Debate over. 

Editor's Note: Donald Trump is America's Peace Time President. Support and follow Townhall's latest reporting on the president's historic trip to the Middle East.

 Join 
Townhall VIP and use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement