Republicans Have an Ineptitude Problem
What Exactly Is the Purpose of NATO in the Year 2026?
Plainclothes Miracle
Jim Acosta Whines That Trump Is 'Winning' His War on the Press
America at 250: Rediscovering Exceptionalism in Rail and Space
The Sudden Political Star of Trump II: Marco Rubio
Barabbas or Bust
Prayer to Remove the Veil of Evil Darkness Over Iran
Good Friday, Resurrection Sunday and the Search for Peace in a Troubled World
Why the Bernie-AOC AI Strategy Is a Gift to Big Tech
Why Not Boots on the Ground in Iran
The Passion Is Not About Death — It’s About a Wedding
Todd Blanche: ActBlue Allegations a 'Priority' of New DOJ
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Moves to End Gun-Free Zones on U.S. Military...
National Capital Planning Commission Approves White House Ballroom in 8–1 Vote
Tipsheet

Oh, So That's Who Might Be Paying the Legal Fees for a Woke VA Prosecutor

Oh, So That's Who Might Be Paying the Legal Fees for a Woke VA Prosecutor
AP Photo/Brennan Linsley

This story seems like it happened nine years ago in Virginia, but it occurred in June. Earlier this summer, Loudoun County Commonwealth Attorney Buta Biberaj was removed from a burglary case by a judge who claimed her office exhibited “overt misrepresentation” of the facts to secure a plea agreement. It’s a move that most in the legal world seldom see, if ever, during their careers. Loudoun County Circuit Court Judge James Plowman removed Baburaj’s office from a criminal case involving Kevin Enrique Valle. 

Advertisement

Valle was facing burglary, destruction of property, and falsifying identification charges. Judge Plowman said that the commonwealth attorney’s office omitted critical details about Valle, specifically his criminal history. The burglaries cited in the plea deal said they occurred within hours of each other. That’s false. Valle went on a larceny spree committing as many as 12 burglaries in four counties over ten days. Consequently, Plowman disqualified the commonwealth attorney’s office from the case.

On top of that, the state’s bar association said they would investigate this incident over whether Biberaj violated ethics codes and other misconduct allegations. She later said that she would appeal the judge’s decision to remove her from the Valle case. Biberaj had been criticized for how she’s handled past cases, like ones involving domestic abusers who rarely got jail time. 

Advertisement

Related:

WOKE

Now, the lawyers she’s hired for the appeal are exorbitantly expensive at $1,000/hour. How can she afford this on a local public servant’s salary? She might be billing us, the taxpayers, for her legal fees. It’s a good question.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement