The fact that Cao represents a horrible district and will probably not be re-elected should have liberated him to do the right thing -- without regard for political considerations. The fact that he will probably not be re-elected should have reinforced his decision to vote "no" -- instead, it persuaded him to vote "aye".
Appeasement, of course, never works. Does Cao really think Democrats will reward him for this? Does he really think Democrats in Louisiana will prefer a squishy Republican over a real liberal Democrat?
Cao's vote has serious implications, inasmuch as it provides Democrats with the rhetorical cover to argue this was a bipartisan bill.
Make no mistake, this was a legacy vote. Cao had one term to make his legacy. ... And he has.
An Unconstitutional Attack on Fossil Fuels in Spokane
The Outlook After the Special Elections
Bitcoin in Perspective: Bill Gates Worth More, Gold 200 Times More
The 'Real Boy' of Fake PBS
Analysis: The Senate's Initial Obamacare 'Repeal' Bill is Fatally Flawed
The Passing of the Pelosi Era