'Iron Lung' and the Future of Filmmaking
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Just Days After Mass Layoffs, WaPo Returns to Lying About the Trump Admin
Nigerian Man Sentenced to Over 8 Years for International Inheritance Fraud Targeting Elder...
Florida's Crackdown on Non-English Speaking Drivers Is Hilarious
Family Fraud: Father, Two Daughters Convicted in $500k USDA Nutrition Program Scam
American Olympians Bash Their Own Country As Democrats and Media Gush
Speculation Into Iran Strike Continues As Warplanes Are Pulled From Super Bowl Flyover...
Tipsheet

Installing Martinez at the RNC

Sen. Mel Martinez will officially be taking over the helm of the RNC today. As a sitting U.S. Senator, Martinez will serve as "general chairman" -- a position which does not exist under the written rules of the RNC.

Advertisement

As you probably have guessed, Martinez is essentially being "installed" by the Bush administration. Supporters of Martinez argue that a Republican president's prerogative is to decide who heads the RNC, and besides, Ronald Reagan set the precedent for this when he pushed the chairmanship of his good friend, Sen. Paul Laxalt of Nevada.

Of course, any leader would probably want to put his loyalists in charge of the party apparatus. That's not uncommon. But in the case of Martinez, there are really three problems: 1. Many conservatives are concerned about his position on amnesty, 2. It is hard to imagine that a sitting U.S. Senator would also have the time to effectively chair the RNC (in fairness, someone else will be tasked with the day-to-day operation), and 3. it is in direct violation of the written rules.

While it is probably a fools errand to attempt to stop a sitting U.S. President from choosing anybody he wants to head his party, it should be noted that this sort of meddling -- whether at the local or national level -- rarely works. Just as local citizens should have the right to choose their leaders, RNC members ought to have the right to choose their leader.

And at the very least, the White House should be expected to play by the rules.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement