Here's Why I'm Concerned
The Suspect in the J6 Pipe Bombing Incident Has Been Captured. Why the...
The Importance of Being Earnest
The Welcome Demise of Climate Change Catastrophism
Making the Judiciary Great Again
Those Lazy, Hazy, Crazy Days of Skipping 'Morning Joe'
Cuellar Should Have Fallen. Instead, He Got a Pardon. Here’s Why.
Closing the Door on Immigration? Not Yet.
Senator Rand Paul Idea Replaces Obamacare With Free Market Alternative
Socialism Is Antithetical to the Genuine American Dream
The War Is Not Over, and There Is No Peace
Who Knew? Being Your Own Boss Can Contribute to the Nation's Birth Rate
U.S. Secret Service Seized 16 Illegal Skimmers, Stopped $16M in Fraud
Two Men Charged After 1,585 Pounds of Meth Found Hidden in Blackberry Shipments...
SCOTUS Upholds New Texas Redistricting Map
Tipsheet
Premium

NIH Official Makes Huge Admission About Gain-of-Function Research

In 2021, Anthony Fauci, then director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) got into a heated exchange over whether the National Institutes of Health funds gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

"For years, Dr. Ralph Baric, a virologist in the U.S., has been collaborating with Dr. Shi Zhengli from the Wuhan Virology Institute, sharing his discoveries about how to create superviruses. This gain-of-function research has been funded by the NIH,” Paul said. “Dr. Fauci, do you still support funding of the NIH lab in Wuhan?"

"With all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect,” Fauci shot back. “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology."

That exchange is making its rounds again on social media in light of the recent admission from NIH principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak during questioning Thursday from lawmakers on the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

“Dr. Tabak, did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through EcoHealth [Alliance]?” asked Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ).

“It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak responded. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”

That admission comes after federal public health officials have for years denied or evaded the question altogether. 

Tabak claimed gain-of-function research, which alters viruses to make them more infectious, is harmless. 

“This is research, the generic term [gain-of-function], is research that goes on in many, many labs around the country. It is not regulated. And the reason it’s not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody,” he said. 


Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement