Here's Why I'm Concerned
The Suspect in the J6 Pipe Bombing Incident Has Been Captured. Why the...
The Importance of Being Earnest
The Welcome Demise of Climate Change Catastrophism
Making the Judiciary Great Again
Those Lazy, Hazy, Crazy Days of Skipping 'Morning Joe'
Cuellar Should Have Fallen. Instead, He Got a Pardon. Here’s Why.
Closing the Door on Immigration? Not Yet.
Senator Rand Paul Idea Replaces Obamacare With Free Market Alternative
Socialism Is Antithetical to the Genuine American Dream
The War Is Not Over, and There Is No Peace
Who Knew? Being Your Own Boss Can Contribute to the Nation's Birth Rate
U.S. Secret Service Seized 16 Illegal Skimmers, Stopped $16M in Fraud
Two Men Charged After 1,585 Pounds of Meth Found Hidden in Blackberry Shipments...
SCOTUS Upholds New Texas Redistricting Map
Tipsheet

Manchin Demands Inclusion of Hyde Amendment in Reconciliation, Has Warning to Dems if It's Not

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin is pushing back on a Democratic plan to push a “Medicaid-like” measure through the reconciliation bill for one simple reason: it lacks the Hyde amendment, which bars the use of federal funds for abortion.

Advertisement

The moderate, pro-life West Virginia Democrat said the bill is “dead on arrival” in the Senate without the Hyde amendment, telling National Review that “it has to be" included.

On Wednesday, the senator also blasted the bill’s hefty $3.5 trillion price tag.

“Spending trillions more on new and expanded government programs, when we can’t even pay for the essential social programs, like Social Security and Medicare, is the definition of fiscal insanity,” he said in a statement. “Suggesting that spending trillions more will not have an impact on inflation ignores the everyday reality that America’s families continue pay an unavoidable inflation tax. Proposing a historic expansion of social programs while ignoring the fact we are not in a recession and that millions of jobs remain open will only feed a dysfunction that could weaken our economic recovery. This is the shared reality we all now face, and it is this reality that must shape the future decisions that we, as elected leaders, must make.”

Manchin then proposed an alternative plan:

Our tax code should be reformed to fix the flaws of the 2017 tax bill and ensure everyone pays their fair share but it should not weaken our global competitiveness or the ability of millions of small businesses to compete with the Amazons of the world. Overall, the amount we spend now must be balanced with what we need and can afford – not designed to reengineer the social and economic fabric of this nation or vengefully tax for the sake of wishful spending.

In August, I recommended we take a strategic pause to provide time to develop the right policies and to continue to monitor how the pandemic and economic factors are affecting our nation’s fiscal situation before we spend more. Throughout September, I have made it clear to all those who would listen the need to means test any new social programs so that we are helping those who need it the most, not spend for the sake of spending.

Advertisement

He vowed to reject supporting trillions in spending that “ignores the brutal fiscal reality our nation faces.” 

 “America is a great nation but great nations throughout history have been weakened by careless spending and bad policies,” he added.

The House is scheduled to vote on the bipartisan infrastructure bill Thursday, but it may be doomed, as progressives have vowed to kill it if an agreement on a larger spending packing isn't reached prior to the infrastructure vote. As Guy reported Wednesday, Biden's agenda could be about to crash and burn.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement