When It Comes to Abortion, the Left Is Terrified of Women Actually Having...
Today’s Deep Political Division Is Caused by Differing Goals
The Times May Be a-Changin’
Cities Won’t Solve the Housing Crisis by Blaming Software
Trump’s Anthropic Action Proves International AI Moratorium Is Possible
Punish Success and Capital Will Leave
Does the Rest of the World Care More About America Than… Americans?
The Next Frontier of American Independence Is in the Medicine Cabinet
From Lionel Messi to Hyenas in Ethiopia: It’s Always ‘the Jews’
The Border Is Not American Soil Until You Cross It
Republicans Are Laying Down One of Their Best Legal Weapons
Biden Fueled China's Chip Boom, but Trump Can Restore America's Lead
Weak and Pathetic: How School Administrators Put Politics Before Parents
Democrats Ask: Obama Who?
They Fought for This Country. They Shouldn't Have to Leave It to Heal.
Tipsheet

US Takes a Stand Against Global Compact on Refugees, Promotion of Abortion at the United Nations

US Takes a Stand Against Global Compact on Refugees, Promotion of Abortion at the United Nations

The United States took a lonely stand Monday against the United Nation’s General Assembly in a vote on the Global Compact on Refugees and on concerns about language related to abortion.

Advertisement

Hungary was the only country to join the United States in voting against an annual resolution on the work of the U.N. refugee agency which included approval of the compact on refugees. The resolution was approved with 181 countries voting in favor and three abstaining.

The U.S. explained its opposition to the compact, arguing that it represents “an effort by the United Nations to advance global governance at the expense of the sovereign right of States to manage their immigration systems in accordance with their national laws, policies, and interests.”

Reuters noted on Monday that the U.S. also “unsuccessfully tried to remove two paragraphs from a General Assembly resolution on preventing violence and sexual harassment of women and girls. It was the only country to vote against the language, while 131 countries voted to keep it in the resolution and 31 abstained.”

This was part of their campaign against the ambiguous terms of “sexual and reproductive health” and “sexual and reproductive health-care services.”

Advertisement

The U.S. explained earlier this month that the language has “accumulated connotations that suggest the promotion of abortion or a right to abortion that are unacceptable to our administration.”

“As has been made clear over many years, there was international consensus that these documents do not create new international rights, including any “right” to abortion,” they emphasized. “The United States fully supports the principle of voluntary choice regarding maternal and child health and family planning. We do not recognize abortion as a method of family planning, nor do we support abortion in our global health assistance.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement