Property Taxes Might Be on the Way Out in This State
Trump Just Blew Up the Media's Narrative on Iran With a Single Post
Scott Pelley Claims of the 'Murder' of 60 Minutes Defied by Ratings; ABC...
Turns Out James Talarico's Church Spends Lots of Money on Woke Causes
No, Tim Walz, England and Australia Aren't 'Free' After Giving Up Guns
Spencer Pratt Has a Final Reminder For LA Voters Ahead of Tuesday's Primary
While Gavin Newsom Blames Trump For CA's Gas Prices, He Just Quietly Hiked...
Palmer Luckey Reveals Why China Is Outpacing the US in Manufacturing—and Why It’s...
Jerome Powell Is Out as Fed Chair, But He Is Still Taking Swipes...
Mamdani Is Running the Classic Socialist Playbook: Blaming Capitalism for Problems the Gov...
Police Officer Involved in Henry Nowak's Murder Resigns Amid Global Controversy
Anti-Weaponization Fund Is Dead, Blanche Says After Congressional Backlash
Sen. Dan Sullivan Threatens Lawsuit Against Mary Peltola's Fake Candidate Also Named 'Dan...
EXCLUSIVE: Incentive Proposed to Enable Homeland Security to Vet Voter Rolls
Starmer Lets Sikhs Keep the Knife That Killed Henry Nowak — but Won't...
Tipsheet

US Reportedly Seeks Warrant for the Arrest of Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange

US Reportedly Seeks Warrant for the Arrest of Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange

CNN reported Thursday evening that US authorities have prepared charges for the arrest of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, citing “officials familiar with the matter.”

Advertisement

The investigation of Assange dates back to 2010, but CNN says that prosecutors “now believe they have found a way to move forward,” despite First Amendment concerns.

During the Obama administration, the Justice Department “determined it would be difficult to bring charges against Assange because WikiLeaks wasn't alone in publishing documents stolen by Manning. Several newspapers, including The New York Times, did as well. The investigation continued, but any possible charges were put on hold,” CNN reports, citing US officials involved in the process then.

However, “The US view of WikiLeaks and Assange began to change after investigators found what they believe was proof that WikiLeaks played an active role in helping Edward Snowden, a former NSA analyst, disclose a massive cache of classified documents."

The Washington Post also reported Thursday that “Federal prosecutors are weighing whether to bring criminal charges against members of the WikiLeaks organization, taking a second look at a 2010 leak of diplomatic cables and military documents and investigating whether the group bears criminal responsibility for the more recent revelation of sensitive CIA cyber-tools.”

Advertisement

Barry J. Pollack, an attorney for Assange, told the Post that there was “no legitimate basis for the Department of Justice to treat WikiLeaks differently than it treats other journalists.”

“WikiLeaks is a publisher, and they are publishing truthful information that is in the public’s interest,” Pollack claimed. “Democracy thrives because there are independent journalists reporting on what it is that the government is doing.”

Pollack called the Obama administration “no shrinking violet when it came to pursuing reporters and journalists.” He said he hoped “this administration will be more respectful, not less respectful, of the First Amendment than the prior administration was.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos