FINALLY: The DHS Shutdown Is Coming to an End...Sort of
This Reporter Was Left With Severe Burns After Asking Trump This Question About...
Animal Rights Movement Seeks to Jail Hunters and Fishermen With This Measure
WaPo Goes on Defense for Eric Swalwell...for Some Reason, and NY Times Brags...
President Trump Has Already Won on Birthright Citizenship
You Won’t Believe Justice Jackson’s Arguments Against Ending Birthright Citizenship
In Today's NBA, Beliefs Can Be a Firing Offense
Trump: Iran Conflict Objectives Are 'Nearing Completion'
Tiny Store, Massive Fraud: Boston Shop Owner Convicted of Trafficking Nearly $7M in...
Artemis II Blasts Off, Marking America’s Return to Deep Space
Judge Revokes Naturalization of Married Couple Who Allegedly Conspired to Steal Medical Tr...
New Report Alleges $180 Billion Stolen from California Public Programs
Five Indicted in $511K Missouri Childcare Fraud Scheme
Ex-Staffer Blows Whistle on Michigan U.S. Senate Candidate’s Foreign Policy Views
Massachusetts Man Charged With Threatening President Trump on Facebook
Tipsheet

US Reportedly Seeks Warrant for the Arrest of Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange

US Reportedly Seeks Warrant for the Arrest of Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange

CNN reported Thursday evening that US authorities have prepared charges for the arrest of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, citing “officials familiar with the matter.”

Advertisement

The investigation of Assange dates back to 2010, but CNN says that prosecutors “now believe they have found a way to move forward,” despite First Amendment concerns.

During the Obama administration, the Justice Department “determined it would be difficult to bring charges against Assange because WikiLeaks wasn't alone in publishing documents stolen by Manning. Several newspapers, including The New York Times, did as well. The investigation continued, but any possible charges were put on hold,” CNN reports, citing US officials involved in the process then.

However, “The US view of WikiLeaks and Assange began to change after investigators found what they believe was proof that WikiLeaks played an active role in helping Edward Snowden, a former NSA analyst, disclose a massive cache of classified documents."

The Washington Post also reported Thursday that “Federal prosecutors are weighing whether to bring criminal charges against members of the WikiLeaks organization, taking a second look at a 2010 leak of diplomatic cables and military documents and investigating whether the group bears criminal responsibility for the more recent revelation of sensitive CIA cyber-tools.”

Advertisement

Barry J. Pollack, an attorney for Assange, told the Post that there was “no legitimate basis for the Department of Justice to treat WikiLeaks differently than it treats other journalists.”

“WikiLeaks is a publisher, and they are publishing truthful information that is in the public’s interest,” Pollack claimed. “Democracy thrives because there are independent journalists reporting on what it is that the government is doing.”

Pollack called the Obama administration “no shrinking violet when it came to pursuing reporters and journalists.” He said he hoped “this administration will be more respectful, not less respectful, of the First Amendment than the prior administration was.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement