Here's How You Knew Libs Were Going to Melt Down When Trump Visited...
What These Michigan Voters Just Said Doesn't Bode Too Well for Kamala
Oh, You Knew Kamala Was Going to Drop These Remarks About Male Voters
Is There Something Cooking in Nevada?
Trump Attended Sunday Night Football. Here's What Happened.
Unseen Middle-Class Black Voters Move Right
Harris Appeals for the Anti-Catholic Vote
'No Stunt': Woman Served by Trump at McDonald's Speaks Out About the Experience
CDC Can Make Good Immunization Policy Without Picking Winners and Losers
Make No Mistake – Lawfare Is on the Ballot
To Prosper, or Not to Prosper, That Is the Question?
Data ‘Cap’ Government Idiocy: They Want Price Controls on the Internet
To Stop the Fentanyl Epidemic and Boost U.S. Manufacturing, End the De Minimis...
Misinformation, Disinformation, & Conspiracy Theories
Fresh Musings on Ethics and the Swamp
Tipsheet

Disclosure

The Defense Appropriations Bill in the Senate has been unveiled and frankly, it is staggering.  Senate appropriators disclosed approximately 936 earmarks totaling $5.1 billion.  Republican Senator Ted Stevens led the earmarking pack with $189 million, followed by Democrat Senators Daniel Inouye at $183 million & Robert Byrd at $166 million.  Interestingly enough, these three Senators represent the states of Alaska, Hawaii, and West Virginia whose combined total population would just barely pass Oregon which ranks 27th in population among the 50 states.

Advertisement

What I find most interesting is not the disclosed earmarks, but rather those that are undisclosed.  Typically the total earmarks in an appropriations bill can be more than double with the inclusion of undisclosed earmarks.  The House version of the Defense appropriations bill contained $3 billion in earmarks, but adding in undisclosed projects in the senate raised the total to the $6.5 billion neighborhood. 

Admitting you have problem is always the first step.  Until Congress and the appropriators agree to disclose each and every earmark for public review and debate, we cannot begin to have meaningful earmark reform.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement