Pro-Hamas Supporters at LSU Didn't Know What to Do When the Fraternities Showed...
Who Thought It Was a Good Idea to Bring Out 'The Lost Jedi'?
The Left’s New School Choice Playbook in Arkansas Serves as a National Warning
Supporters of President Trump Should Not Support Biden’s DOJ or its Dark Antitrust...
The Truth About the CIA
The Left’s Radicalization Of Our Children
Holly Rehder: The Only MAGA Candidate in the Race for Missouri Lt. Governor
RFK, Jr.'s Proposed 'No Spoiler Pledge' Is a Stroke of Genius
It's Time to Use American Energy As a Weapon
Why Intellectuals Don't Like Capitalism
NYPD Reveals Details About the 'Professional' Pro-Hamas Agitators Popping Up on Campuses
Liberal Reporter Triggered by Frat Boys Counterprotesting Hamas Agitators, Calls Them 'Rac...
Columbia President Breaks Overdue Silence Amid Pro-Hamas Protests
Illegal Immigrants Ambush Michigan State Capitol to Demand Driver Licenses
Trump Narrows His VP List Down to These Four Potential Candidates
Tipsheet

10 Point Plan for Earmark Reform


As you know, I believe the earmark process must be completely reformed. The current system is neither transparent nor does it have checks and balances or accountability.
Advertisement


Here is a summary of my 10 point plan to reform the process. You will hear more about my plans for this in the future.

10 Point Plan for Earmark Reform

  1. Members must make public and fully disclose all earmark requests when they are submitted.
  2. Put every earmark in the text of the bill.
  3. The bill should fully disclose all earmarks with the requesting member(s), amounts, recipients and purpose at least 1 week before any bill containing earmarks is brought to the floor.
  4. All earmarks must be available for discussion at an open Congressional hearing.
  5. All earmarks for programs must be previously authorized by Congress.
  6. Earmarks must serve a federal interest and/or have a federal nexus.
  7. No earmarks outside of a member's own state.
  8. No earmarks to private entities without a competitive bidding process.
  9. No earmark can be added or increased in a conference committee to an amount greater than the amount passed in either the House or the Senate version of the bill.
  10. The dollar amount of any earmarks reduced by amendment or committee should go towards debt/deficit reduction and not be reallocated into other spending.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement