Biden's Latest Regulations Will Crash the Electric Grid
NYPD Patrol Chief Shuts AOC Down After She Posts Defense of Pro-Hamas Agitators...
USC Cancels Commencement Ceremony Amid Pro-Hamas Antics By Lunatic Students
Iran-Backed Terrorists Resume Attacks on U.S. Service Members in the Middle East
White House Attempt to Cover for Biden's Latest Gaffe Might Be Its Most...
US, 17 Other Nations Issue Joint Statement Calling on Hamas to Release Hostages
DeSantis Reveals How Florida Colleges Will Respond to Pro-Hamas Students
Here’s Why Several State AGs Filed a Lawsuit Against a Biden Administration Abortion...
A Principal Was Removed, Faced Threats for Making Racist Comments. There's Just One,...
The Biden White House Is Still at Odds With The New York Times
Newsom Unveils Bill in Response to Arizona's Impending Pro-Life Law
Wow: Biden Just Endorsed a Disastrous, Unpopular Economic Policy That Will Inflict Even...
The Left Would Prosecute Trump for Acts He Never Committed, But Obama Did
Another Poll on Battleground States Is Here to Toss Cold Water on Biden's...
Could Texas Ban ‘Gender Nonconforming’ Teachers From Schools?
Tipsheet

Can't Have It Both Ways On "Empathy" Justices

The Huffington Post and Media Matters are hollering about conservative news outlets ignoring the rest of Obama's statement with regards to "empathetic" Supreme Court justices. Here's the Obama quote that was commonly reported:
Advertisement

I view that quality of empathy, and understanding, and identifying with people's hopes and struggles as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes.
It was followed up by this:
I will seek someone who is dedicated to the rule of law, who honors our Constitutional traditions, who respects the integrity of the judicial process, and the appropriate limits of the judicial role.
Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. "Identifying with people's hopes and struggles" is entirely separate from maintaining constitutional integrity on judicial issues. Inserting "empathy" into a legal ruling explicitly means you disregard meaningful judicial review, giving favor to groups you have more personal sympathy for instead of those who should be viewed favorably based on the letter of the law.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement