Here's Why I'm Concerned
The Suspect in the J6 Pipe Bombing Incident Has Been Captured. Why the...
A Newsom Nihilist Nomination?
The Importance of Being Earnest
Media Make 'Venezuelan Fishermen' the New 'Maryland Father,' and Covering Up the Minnesota...
The Welcome Demise of Climate Change Catastrophism
Making the Judiciary Great Again
Those Lazy, Hazy, Crazy Days of Skipping 'Morning Joe'
Closing the Door on Immigration? Not Yet.
Socialism Is Antithetical to the Genuine American Dream
The War Is Not Over, and There Is No Peace
U.S. Secret Service Seized 16 Illegal Skimmers, Stopped $16M in Fraud
Two Men Charged After 1,585 Pounds of Meth Found Hidden in Blackberry Shipments...
SCOTUS Upholds New Texas Redistricting Map
Georgia CEO Gets Eight Years for Bribery Scheme Involving Honduran Police Contracts
Tipsheet

Former CDC Director: Gain-of-Function Research Moratorium ‘Very Important’

Official White House Photo by D. Myles Cullen

The former director of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Dr. Robert Redfield, said Wednesday that he is in complete support of the decision by President Trump to put a moratorium on funding of gain-of-function research, calling it “very important.”

Advertisement

Trump signed an executive order on Monday in order to stop these experiments by cutting off funding to countries where they occur. 

“I did an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal back in 2021, really calling on our government to put a moratorium on it," Redfield told Newsmax. "There's really no scientific advantage for doing this type of research and there's a real downside in terms of creating pathogens that may cause problems that we don't have countermeasures [for], like the COVID-19 virus, which I do believe was a direct consequence of gain-of-function research.” 

The position that supporters of gain-of-function research take, that scientists need to “create these dangerous viruses to know how to develop countermeasures to them,” is “a mistake,” Redfield added.

“I argue that we have enough scientific capacity that if and when we're challenged with a new pathogen, that we can apply the tools of science to address that pathogen and develop countermeasures," he continued. "We don't have to create the pathogen to figure out how to defend against the pathogen."

“Scientists like to ask questions,” but often forget to ask if certain questions should be asked.

“They like to ask questions, and this was a big part of spending significant resources on scientific research," Redfield said. "But I think it's ill-advised and I really support Trump's decision to put a moratorium on gain-of-function research.” 

Advertisement

Related:

SCIENCE

Redfield added a criticism for Dr. Anthony Fauci, the expert on infectious diseases who advised both Trump and former President Biden on COVID-19. Fauci had told Congress in 2021 that he had “never lied” about funding gain-of-function research.

“I think there's no doubt that the funding was responsible for creating the COVID virus that then caused the COVID pandemic," Redfield argued. "And really, it's a hypothetical argument that Tony keeps using. He says if you take a pathogen that's nonpathogenic for humans and you make it pathogenic for humans, that's not gain-of-function research. You have to start with the pathogen that's already pathogenic for humans. So, he's just playing games with the wording.” 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement