The Decline of Rock Parallels the Decline of America
Wait, There Was a Finger Fight During This WNBA Game?
Why Tim Walz Is Probably Happy This Graham Platner Social Media Post Has...
Maine Mom Couldn't Enjoy Kid's Graduation Because She Thought ICE Was in the...
Tyler Metcalf's Dad Absolutely Torches The View's Sunny Hostin Over Her Remarks About...
This MS NOW Contributor Had the Most Laughable Take on Algae in the...
This Ex-ESPN Host Said *What Now* About Trump and Obama's Nuke Deal
Minimum Wage Fail
Ted Lieu Vows Lawfare Against Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche
AAG McDonald Told the Nation Just How Much of Our Money Was Stolen...
Chicago’s Mayor Just Got Busted for Lying About the City’s Green Energy Promises
If Citizens Lose Faith in Elections, Accountability Dies
World Cracking Down on Immigration Abuse, a Decade After 'Fact-Checks' Called Trump Claim...
Leadership 101
The Vanishing Conservative Supreme Court
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Hands Trump Administration Huge Victory on Election Security

Federal Judge Hands Trump Administration Huge Victory on Election Security
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

A federal judge just handed the Trump administration a victory related to its efforts to protect election integrity when he refused to block President Donald Trump’s executive order to establish a voter list while placing restrictions on mail-in ballots.

Advertisement

From The Associated Press:

A federal judge has declined to halt President Donald Trump’s executive order creating a federal voter list and limiting mail voting, clearing the way for potential sweeping changes in how American elections are run shortly before this year’s midterm elections.

U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee in Washington, late Wednesday rejected the request by Democrats and civil rights groups that had argued Trump’s order would likely be found unconstitutional because the states and Congress, not the president, have the power to set election rules. Nichols agreed with the Republican Trump administration’s contention that it was too early to block the order because it has yet to be implemented.

“The Court recognizes that the Postal Service may ultimately issue a final rule that directly affects Plaintiffs or their members, or that the Government may develop State Citizenship Lists that omit specific individuals due to particularized flaws,” Nichols wrote. “Plaintiffs may, of course, renew their motions if and when those future actions occur. Until then, however, Plaintiffs cannot show that preliminary injunctive relief is warranted.”

The legal battle against the provision now shifts to Boston, where voting rights groups have a separate lawsuit seeking to temporarily block the executive order in federal court. The Trump administration has yet to formally issue lists of eligible voters, and those who filed the initial request for a temporary halt said they’d be back if the administration moves in that direction.

Advertisement

Trump signed the order in late March. It creates a federal database listing citizens who are eligible to vote in each state. It directed the Department of Homeland Security to create “State Citizenship Lists” using federal records on citizenship, naturalization, and Social Security data. The move is meant to ensure that noncitizens are not fraudulently voting in federal elections.

The order also instructs the U.S. Postal Service to create rules for mail-in and absentee ballots and to deliver these ballots only to those on the approved lists. It threatens criminal prosecutions or the loss of federal funds for officials who send ballots to people who are not on the lists.

Advertisement

This executive order is part of Trump’s effort to tighten up election rules and to make it harder for noncitizens to cast ballots in federal races. Critics slammed the order, calling it overreach because the Constitution grants states primary control over how they handle their elections. Over 20 blue states sued the Trump administration in April over the issue. 

The plaintiffs insist that the lists could wrongly exclude eligible voters because federal databases are not proficient enough to handle this type of task. They also contend that the Postal Service has no authority to do election enforcement.

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos