Why Thomas Massie's Ex-Girlfriend Came Forward With This Hush Money Story
These Students Want to Cancel a Speaker for Not Being Part of Their...
Bill Cassidy Goes After His Trump-Endorsed Opponent Over DEI – It's Not Going...
Three Reasons Why Virginia’s Redistricting Amendment Should Fail
The NY Times Continues Flailing Over Kristof's Column; Politico Warns Democrats Might Turn...
Mall Brats
Georgia Pro-Gun Bill's Veto Doesn't Mean What Anti-Gunners Seem to Think
We Now Know Why Brigitte Macron Slapped the French President Last Year
Nick Shirley Went to Cuba to Investigate Life Under Communism. Here's What He...
Fentanyl Playground: LA Is a Walking Campaign Ad for Spencer Pratt
Jim Jordan Torches Fairfax Commonwealth Attorney Over Quiet Website Change on Immigration...
U.S. Supreme Court Temporarily Restores Nationwide Mail Access to Abortion Pill
Mexican National Sentenced to 11 Years for Running Major U.S.-Mexico Border Smuggling Oper...
2018 West MI Woman of the Year Sentenced for Allegedly Stealing $1.4M Meant...
Trump Has the Cards for an AI Deal With China
Tipsheet

Justice Department Tries to Salvage Case Against James Comey

Justice Department Tries to Salvage Case Against James Comey
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

The Justice Department now claims that the grand jury that indicted former FBI Director James Comey did read the full document before making its decision.

On Thursday, it was revealed in court that only the grand jury’s foreperson had read the updated document, which Comey’s attorneys argued was grounds for dismissal.

Advertisement

From The Hill:

The Justice Department reversed course Thursday, alleging the full grand jury did review the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. 

The change comes 24 hours after lead prosecutor Lindsey Halligan told a judge that all jurors were not privy to the final revised document displaying his charges.

Federal prosecutors on Thursday filed a notice “correcting the record” in an effort to salvage their case against Comey by confirming that all jurors reviewed their final revised document, which included two of the three counts jurors voted to uphold in Comey’s indictment.

In the document, Halligan wrote that “any assertion that the grand jury ‘never voted on the two-count indictment,’ is contradicted by the official transcript” declaring that the record leaves “no room for ambiguity.”

She described the situation as a “clerical inconsistency” relating only to the nixed first count, insisting the Comey indictment is valid.

Comey’s defense also contended that if the full grand jury did not see the indictment, it could mean the statute of limitations on the charges against the former FBI director may have expired. If the judge agrees, he might dismiss the case.

Advertisement

Several legal experts have questioned the validity of the indictment. Critics claim that the prosecution is motivated by politics.

The Justice Department alleges that Comey made false statements to Congress and obstructed a congressional proceeding. The charges stem from his sworn testimony before the Senate in September 2020, in which he claimed he had not authorized an FBI agent to leak information about the investigation into President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign. 

Comey has pleaded not guilty to the charges, which were filed just before the five-year statute of limitations expired. 

Editor’s Note: Help us continue to report the truth about corrupt leaders like James Comey. 

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement