I'm Stunned USA Today Published This Op-Ed From a Dem About Trump's State...
This Always Happens With These Anti-ICE Stories in the Media
This State's Lawmakers Are Pushing a Bill That Would Ban Facial Recognition Technology
Top Baton Rouge Aide Indicted for Stealing Taxpayer Funds in 'Kickback' Scheme
What Will Stop the Iranian Regime's Oppression and Murder of Its People?
The Media Once Scolded Us for Using a Certain Label They Now Love
Illegal Alien Hurt Three Kids While Evading Arrest. Guess Who the Mayor Blames.
California Dems Took Nearly $1B From a Solar Panel Project to Build a...
Florida Airport Becomes the First Nationwide to Ban Passengers From Wearing Pajamas
JD Vance Says There Is ‘No Chance’ of Prolonged War as US Warships...
Here's How Mamdani's Snow Shoveling Program is Going
Steve Hilton's CalDOGE Says It Uncovered Over $900M in State Fraud in Second...
What the World Needs Now
U.S. Seeks Forfeiture of Seized Oil Tanker and 1.8 Million Barrels of Oil
Illinois Pair Convicted in $5 Million Multistate Pyramid Scheme Case
Tipsheet

This Bill Aims to Protect Children From Pornography – but There Might Be Some Issues

This Bill Aims to Protect Children From Pornography  – but There Might Be Some Issues
AP Photo/Eric Talmadge

A group of House Republicans has introduced a measure aimed at preventing children from viewing inappropriate content on the internet.

The bill, titled the “Shielding Children’s Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net Act,” (SCREEN) would mandate that online platforms require identification from its users to view their content. 

Advertisement

Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL) introduced the measure in a post on X. “Children should NEVER have access to adult content online,” she wrote. “This is something everyone should agree on, yet many sites refuse to enforce strong age verification.”

The SCREEN Act acknowledged several failed attempts to pass similar legislation and noted that current filtering software is not effective. However, “Congress has a ‘compelling government interest’ to protect the physical and psychological well-being of minors.”

The bill notes that modern technology enables companies to use non-intrusive age verification methods. It claims “filters do not work on 1 in 10 pornography sites accessed intentionally and 1 in 3 pornography sites that are accessed unintentionally.”

The would apply to commercial interactive computer services that host or distribute material deemed “harmful to minors,” including obscenity and child pornography. The platforms would be required to adopt “technology verification measures” to verify a user’s age.

Advertisement

The platforms would also have to verify IP addresses—including virtual private networks (VPNs), unless they could prove a user is operating outside of the United States. The companies must also retain age verification data only for as long as necessary and secure it from unauthorized access.

Enforcement of the proposed legislation would fall to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). It would task the agency with conducting audits, issuing guidance, and bringing enforcement actions against those who run afoul of the law. “A violation of section 4 shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice,” the bill reads. 

Most people can agree that children should not view pornography or other forms of inappropriate material. But this bill has some issues.

For starters, it could essentially end anonymous browsing for adults and crack down on lawful speech. It would empower these platforms to collect sensitive data like government IDs, biometric, or other personally identifiable information — even with safeguards in place.

Advertisement

Forcing companies to compile and store this information would inevitably lead to invasive data collection. This would create more risks of surveillance and hacking, leaving Americans vulnerable.

There are also constitutional issues with the bill. Prior bills have faced opposition from those arguing that such legislation violates the First Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled in Ashcroft v. ACLU in 2004 that the government cannot enact policies preventing adults from accessing content protected by the First Amendment — even if it is ostensibly aimed at protecting children.

In the end, it is the job of parents to protect their children from inappropriate content, not the government’s. There are plenty of programs that can allow people to monitor their children’s browsing habits while blocking sites they don’t want their kids to see. Instead of relying on a nanny state, people must take responsibility for the content their children are consuming.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall's VIP program and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement