Why the Washington Nationals Just Fired One of Their Executives. Hint: It's Woke...
Japan Overhauled Its Entire Intelligence Community...and One Nation Is Not Happy About It
NY Gov Tried to Dunk on Trump About the Knicks, and Failed Miserably
Why This Milwaukee Brewers Pitcher Got a One-Game Suspension. It Was Pretty Damn...
Jefferson on How to Restore the Republic
Pollsters Are Underestimating Trump 10 Years Later. What Might It Mean for the...
The Push by Democrats to Ban One of the Commonly Owned Handguns in...
How AI Threatens to Destroy the Core Self and How to Fight Back
Mission Laundering: What the OpenAI Verdict Didn't Resolve
Germany's Bureaucracy Crisis: How Red Tape Is Costing the Economy €146 Billion a...
The Real AI Risk Isn’t Regulation. It’s Strategic Blindness.
America Is Sleepwalking Toward Q-Day While Cybercriminals Prepare for the Future
Putin’s Efforts to Subvert Armenia’s Elections Can Harm US Interests
The Deal to Keep the Islamic Republic Alive
US-UAE Relations: Dubai Remains a Pillar of Stability in the Middle East
Tipsheet

Another Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Efforts to Eliminate Birthright Citizenship

Another Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Efforts to Eliminate Birthright Citizenship
AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

A federal judge has issued another ruling blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship.

US District Judge Joseph Laplante in New Hampshire issued a nationwide order stopping the enforcement of the order even after the US Supreme Court placed restrictions on the ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions, according to Reuters.

Advertisement

Laplante’s ruling comes after ten immigrant rights advocates requested that he grant class action status to a lawsuit representing any babies affected by Trump’s order, which applies to children born after February 19, 2025. The judge agreed to their request, which allowed him to block the order.

Back in February, US District Judge Deborah Boardman extended a 14-day injunction on the executive order that had been previously issued by a Seattle judge. She insisted that “virtually every baby born on US soil is a US citizen upon birth” and that this is “the law and tradition of our country.”

Several civil rights groups have challenged the order, arguing that the president does not have the authority to unilaterally alter immigration policy, especially when it concerns birthright citizenship.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court ruled against nationwide injunctions, but it did allow for class-action lawsuits that might have a similar impact. Another judge recently used this loophole to stop the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from cutting short Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for over 500,000 Haitian migrants.

Despite the Supreme Court's ruling, it is clear that those opposing Trump's policies still have a way to stop them at the national level if they apply to a certain class of people. Shortly after the high court's ruling, which also involved the executive order, the plaintiffs in that case began a class-action lawsuit against the administration. 

In the end, it will likely be the Supreme Court that settles the debate over Trump's birthright citizenship policy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos