What VA Dems Are Doing Following Their Brutal Redistricting Defeat Will Leave You...
Remember When Hakeem Jeffries Said This About Redistricting? He Just Ate Those Words
Did Anyone Notice What Was Funny With This VA Dem Senator's Take on...
NBC News Said What About Kyle Rittenhouse?!
Parents Should Protect Their Children, Not Encourage Delusions
Five-Time Felon Allegedly Ran COVID-19 Unemployment Scam Using Inmates' Identities
Russian President Putin Says Russia-Ukraine War Is 'Coming to an End'
DOJ Seeks to Denaturalize 12 Accused of Serious Crimes
North Carolina's Autism Billing Jumped 47,000 Percent in Five Years. Someone Should Explai...
2 Syracuse Cops Shot, Suspect Barricaded After Reportedly Slicing Dog With Machete
Frontier Flight Fatally Hits Trespassing Pedestrian on Denver Runway, 12 Hurt
Trump Announces Ceasefire in Russia-Ukraine War
DOJ Sues New Mexico and Albuquerque Over Laws Blocking Federal Immigration Enforcement
Abby Phillip Is Raging About the GOP's Redistricting Wins
Wait, That's Who Democrats Are Bringing Out to Flip Texas?
Tipsheet

Another Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Efforts to Eliminate Birthright Citizenship

Another Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Efforts to Eliminate Birthright Citizenship
AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

A federal judge has issued another ruling blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship.

US District Judge Joseph Laplante in New Hampshire issued a nationwide order stopping the enforcement of the order even after the US Supreme Court placed restrictions on the ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions, according to Reuters.

Advertisement

Laplante’s ruling comes after ten immigrant rights advocates requested that he grant class action status to a lawsuit representing any babies affected by Trump’s order, which applies to children born after February 19, 2025. The judge agreed to their request, which allowed him to block the order.

Back in February, US District Judge Deborah Boardman extended a 14-day injunction on the executive order that had been previously issued by a Seattle judge. She insisted that “virtually every baby born on US soil is a US citizen upon birth” and that this is “the law and tradition of our country.”

Several civil rights groups have challenged the order, arguing that the president does not have the authority to unilaterally alter immigration policy, especially when it concerns birthright citizenship.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court ruled against nationwide injunctions, but it did allow for class-action lawsuits that might have a similar impact. Another judge recently used this loophole to stop the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from cutting short Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for over 500,000 Haitian migrants.

Despite the Supreme Court's ruling, it is clear that those opposing Trump's policies still have a way to stop them at the national level if they apply to a certain class of people. Shortly after the high court's ruling, which also involved the executive order, the plaintiffs in that case began a class-action lawsuit against the administration. 

In the end, it will likely be the Supreme Court that settles the debate over Trump's birthright citizenship policy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos