How My 2025 Predictions Went – and Some Predictions for 2026
While America Watched the Border, the Cyber Front Exploded
Let’s All Hope 2026 Brings Us Some Real ‘News’ Outlets
If Elected CA Governor, Eric Swalwell Vows to Weaponize Government Against ICE Agents
'Just Fine:' WI Governor Tony Evers Continues to Withhold SNAP Data From the...
With Islam on the Rise, Gay European Voters Shift to the Right
Yeah, Culture Does Matter
Obamacare Was, Is and Will Always Be a Problem
Oligarchies, Terrorism, Greed, and Other Obstacles to Forecasting the Future
Minnesota’s Fraud Is Blowing the Lid Off a Broken Election System
The Danger of Nick Fuentes' Ideology
Will the US Senate Stall Much-Needed Permitting Reforms?
Video of Woman Saying 'Fraud Is Bad' Fuels Scrutiny of Minnesota Childcare Program
Former Real Estate Professional Convicted in $2.4M Investor Fraud Scheme
New Media Shine While Legacy Media Die
Tipsheet

Do We Really Need to Trans Shakespeare?

Laurie Sparham/Roadside Attractions via AP

For some bizarre reason, some on the hard left insist on transing all the things. Now, they are coming for William Shakespeare’s works.

An academic in the United Kingdom claims all of the main characters in Shakespeare’s “Macbeth” were gender-fluid. The play is a tragedy about a Scottish nobleman who resorts to skulduggery to seize the kingdom with the help of his wife, Lady Macbeth.

Advertisement

But, apparently, all the major players in the story are transgender or non-binary, according to British lecturer Ruth Fernando, who claims Shakespeare used the titular character and his wife to “disrupt and contrast the conventional ideas of masculinity and femininity, examining them in the form of androgyny.”

In a paper titled “Man, Woman, or Both? Shakespeare’s Treatment of Androgyny and Lady Macbeth’s Disempowerment,” she also suggests the “Weird Sisters,” who issue the prophecy that inspires Macbeth to take power, could be male because they had beards.

She further posits that Lady Macbeth’s penchant for acknowledging masculine traits within herself, especially through her famous “unsex me here” soliloquy, is a form of “verbal androgyny” that destabilizes her identity, disempowering her. “Lady Macbeth’s androgynous nature reduces her role in the play and disables her empowerment,” Fernando writes.

The lecturer further explains that Lady Macbeth’s supposed gender confusion results in internal conflict, which leads to her downfall, as well as her husband. Shakespeare portrays her as a “fiend-like queen,” who assumes violent masculinity, but is unable to carry out a murder herself. “Her conscience is compressed with feminine guilt instead of masculine ambition,” Fernando writes.

Advertisement

Lady Macbeth’s eventual demise comes about because of the failure of androgyny to liberate her and others from the patriarchal setting of the play. “Androgyny, hence, dissuades Lady Macbeth from the traditional gendered roles, but her placing within the play is not improved.”

Fernando is not the only one to try shoehorning gender ideology into Shakespeare’s works. Sir Ian McKellen, who played the wizard Gandalf in the “Lord of the Rings” films, is set to participate in a production of “Twelfth Night,” which features a cast of transgender and non-binary performers.

McKellan is joining a theatre group called “Trans What You Will” to participate in the July performance. "Twelfth Night is perhaps the funniest and most moving of Shakespeare's plays. This is achieved through the complexity of gender and sexuality from first to last,” the actor said, according to a press release.

The play is about a woman named Viola, who disguises herself as a man to work for a duke with whom she eventually falls in love. Of course, this means that Shakespeare was exploring transgenderism, according to folks on the hard left.

It’s enjoyable to explore the various themes that run through the works of Shakespeare and other literary legends. In some ways, the character Iago can be seen as a homosexual who eventually brings about the fall of Othello because he had a massive crush on him.

Advertisement

But what’s the point of trying to force gender ideology into these works when they are clearly not present? Yes, there are gender-related themes in his plays, but this does not necessarily mean he was promoting a form of gender ideology. It seems this is just another way to persuade people to embrace progressive ideas on gender and sexuality using Shakespeare. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement