It's Going to Be a Great Year
'Then It Is War:' Elon Musk Responds to Somali TikToker's Death Threat
Mamdani's Disastrous Block Party Is a Glimpse Into NYC's Socialist Future
There Was Another Freudian Slip at the Minnesota Daycare Fraud Press Conference
Los Angeles Fire Victims Were Silenced During Peaceful Rose Bowl Parade Protest
The FBI Thwarted Another New Year's Eve Terror Plot, This Time in North...
The Woke Collapse of Harvard Continues
Democrat Prosecutor Receives Massive Blowback After Statement on Reports of Somali Fraud
The Minnesota Congressional Delegation Is Demanding Answers and Accountability From Tim Wa...
'Locked and Loaded:' President Trump Issues Warning to Iran As Anti-Regime Protests Enter...
San Francisco Mayor Signs Bill Establishing Reparations Fund
Guess What Mamdani Did on Day One As NYC Mayor
Peace Through Strength: Venezuela’s Maduro Suddenly Ready to Negotiate
The ‘Warmth’ of Collectivism Comes With a Body Count — Conservatives Respond to...
Journalist Who Exposed $100M Somali Daycare Fraud Says He’s Now Getting Death Threats
Tipsheet

The Trump Administration's Efforts to Overhaul the Education System Just Hit a Major Roadblock

AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

In a significant blow to the Trump administration’s efforts to overhaul the education system, the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts imposed a preliminary injunction against President Donald Trump’s initiative to gut the Department of Education (DOE).

Advertisement

The Trump administration initiated a considerable reduction in force (RIF), cutting over 50 percent of the agency’s staff. The court suggested that the administration cannot make such significant changes without congressional approval.

US District Judge Myong Joun pointed out that the White House’s “true intention is to effectively dismantle the Department without an authorizing statute” and argued that “the Department cannot be shut down without Congress’s approval.”

Joun found that the White House’s move violated constitutional and statutory rules and provisions, including the separation of powers, the Take Care Clause, and the Administrative Procedure Act.

The judge’s ruling comes after 21 states, school districts, unions, and advocacy groups filed a lawsuit asserting that the staffing cuts had crippled essential educational services. These include 12 regional civil rights offices and the processing of student loans and distribution of special education funds. The judge stated that the plaintiffs “have demonstrated that the Department will not be able to carry out its statutory functions—and in some cases, is already unable to do so.”

Advertisement

Joun insisted that this case is not just about employment practices. “The idea that Defendants’ actions are merely a ‘reorganization’ is plainly not true,” he said, further suggesting that the ruling is aimed at preventing the White House from bypassing Congress. 

The Trump administration has not indicated whether it plans to appeal the ruling. But the matter will still be litigated in court. It’s not certain how a court will eventually rule in this matter, but there is a strong argument that shutting down a department requires Congressional input.

However, it is also uncertain whether such an initiative would have enough support, even in a Republican-controlled legislature. 

Editor’s Note: To celebrate the passage of the tremendous One Big, Beautiful Bill, we’re offering a fire sale on VIP memberships

Join us in the fight against the radical left today and support our reporting as President Trump continues to usher in the Golden Age of America. Use promo code POTUS47  at checkout to get 74% off!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement