Dear Media, Please Just Take the 'L' on the Biden Mental Decline Story....
Bill Maher Guest: Trump Voters Tell Me They Regret Their Vote.
Oh, So That's the Real Reason Those Democratic Lawmakers Went to El Salvador
Popular Chinese Retailers Hiking Prices in Response to Trump's Tariffs
David Brooks Sternly Opposes a Judge's Arrest As He Admits Being Unaware, and...
Carlsbad Man Stripped of Gun Rights Over Private Conversation With the Wrong Person
Sen. Hawley Revives ‘PELOSI Act’ to Crack Down on Congressional Stock Trading
Trump Celebrates 'Most Successful' First 100 Days, Vows to Fight the 'Corrupt Political...
ISIS Suspect Arrested In Deadly Bourbon Street Attack That Killed 14 on New...
We Know How Trump Is Doing in the Polls, but What About Democrats?
'Parenting 101:' Homan Says U.S.-Born Kids Don’t Protect Illegal Immigrants from Deportati...
Trump-Era Revival: Dolly Parton’s Threads Takes Stage at The Kennedy Center In Patriotic...
MSNBC Urges Reporters to Blur Illegal Alien's Mugshots on WH Lawn
Homan Tells Illegals They ‘Cannot Hide From ICE’
This State Passed a Massive School Choice Measure
Tipsheet

Can Congress Stop Democrats' Lawfare Against Trump's Policies? This Lawmaker Thinks So.

AP Photo/Ben Curtis

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) announced on Thursday that he plans to introduce legislation to stop the use of lawfare to stymie President Donald Trump’s agenda.

The senator in a post on X said, “District Court judges have issued RECORD numbers of national injunctions against the Trump administration – a dramatic abuse of judicial authority.”

Advertisement

During an appearance on conservative podcaster Charlie Kirk’s show, Hawley said district and federal courts are saying they are “just going to issue an order that says what the executive branch can or cannot do in my district, I’m going to issue an order that binds the executive branch for the entire nation.”

Either the Supreme Court needs to intervene and make clear there's only one court that can issue rules for the whole country, that's the Supreme Court, that's why we only have one of them. And or, if they won't do that, Congress needs to legislate and make clear that district courts do not have the ability to issue these kinds of injunctions.

Indeed, Democrats have taken to using the court system to hamper Trump’s policies since they do not control either chamber of Congress. Most recently, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ordered the Trump administration not to deport over 200 Venezuelan illegal immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act. However, the plan was already in the air when he issued the order, so the illegals, many of whom were suspected members of the Tren de Aragua gang, still made it to El Salvador, where they are being housed in a maximum security facility.

Advertisement

Another judge recently blocked Trump’s executive order banning trans-identified individuals from the military.

These are only a few of the lawsuits Democrats have filed against the Trump administration. These efforts are expected to keep the courts quite busy as the White House fights back against the legal onslaught.

At first glance, what Hawley is proposing sounds like a good and reasonable idea. After all, how much power should the judiciary have when it comes to checking the executive branch?

However, this type of legislation could easily be used against Republicans when Democrats eventually regain power. Indeed, while former President Joe Biden was in office, he faced similar challenges when trying to implement certain policies.

U.S. District Judge Drew Tipton, based in Texas, issued a national injunction on the Biden White House’s 100-day moratorium on deportations. The administration was eventually forced to abandon the policy.

Another judge blocked Biden’s executive order halting new oil and gas leases on federal lands in 2021. The ruling came after a lawsuit filed by 13 GOP-led states claiming that the move would harm their economies.

The same judge also issued an injunction against Biden’s executive order mandating the COVID-19 vaccine for healthcare workers at facilities that receive Medicare and Medicaid funds. Red states argued that this move exceeded federal authority.

Advertisement

There are plenty of instances in which judges have rightly stopped a president from issuing sweeping executive orders. Of course, as we have seen so far, there are times when a judge’s ability to issue nationwide orders goes wrong. But even then, the matter can and will be litigated in court. In many of these situations, the Trump administration stands a good chance of winning the overall legal battles.

Eliminating this ability would free up the president to enact his agenda. But it would also make it easier for future Democratic presidents to push theirs as well, which won’t exactly be good for the country.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement