An Anti-ICE Activist Tried Interfering With an Arrest in California. Guess What Happened...
CNN Hosts Peddled a Lie About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting..and DHS Wasn't Gonna...
NYC Official Who Mocked Charlie Kirk's Death Is In Deep Trouble
Zohran Mamdani’s Exploitation of Black Voters Represents Everything I Hate About Democrats
Watch Tim Walz Make a Fool Out of Himself Yet Again
These Democrat States Are Declaring War on ICE
No More Taxes Until the Fraud Stops
She's At It Again: Candace Owens Claims Charlie Kirk Was a Time Traveler
Border Czar Tom Homan Warns Anti-ICE Rhetoric Could Spark More Bloodshed
Gutfeld Eviscerates Jessica Tarlov for Defending Protesters Harassing ICE Agents
‘They Are Killing Their Own Children’: Iranian Commander’s Daughter Speaks Out Amid Nation...
Trump Threatens to Tariff Countries Opposing His Effort to Control Greenland
Pentagon Leaker Charged for Possessing Classified Documents on the Venezuela Raid
Five Florida Eye Practices to Pay Nearly $6M to Settle False Claims Act...
Law Enforcement Arrests Alleged Gang Member Who Stole Weapon, Vandalized ICE Vehicle
Tipsheet
Premium

The Astonishing Reason a British Engineer Allegedly Lost His Job

AP Photo/Frank Augstein

When Vice President Vance called out the collapse of free speech and expression in Europe several weeks ago, many allied elites clutched their pearls.  Vance was right, though, and he offered a number of illustrative examples in his address.  A subsequent 60 Minutes package praising Germany's government censorship affirmed Vance's thesis.  Additional instances the Vice President highlighted involved our British friends: 

Perhaps most concerningly, I look to our very dear friends, the United Kingdom, where the backslide away from conscience rights has placed the basic liberties of religious Britons, in particular, in the crosshairs.  A little over two years ago, the British government charged Adam Smith-Connor, a 51-year-old physiotherapist and an army veteran, with the heinous crime of standing 50 meters from an abortion clinic and silently praying for three minutes—not obstructing anyone, not interacting with anyone, just silently praying on his own.  And after British law enforcement spotted him and demanded to know what he was praying for, Adam replied, simply, it was on behalf of the unborn son he and his former girlfriend had aborted years before. 

Now, the officers were not moved. Adam was found guilty of breaking the government’s new “buffer zones” law, which criminalizes silent prayer and other actions that could “influence” a person’s decision within 200 meters of an abortion facility. He was sentenced to pay thousands of pounds in legal costs to the prosecution. Now, I wish I could say that this was a fluke—a one-off, crazy example of a badly written law being enacted against a single person. But, no, this last October, just a few months ago, the Scottish government began distributing letters to citizens whose houses lay within so-called “safe access zones,” warning them that even private prayer within their own homes may amount to breaking the law.  Naturally, the government urged readers to report any fellow citizens suspected guilty of thoughtcrime.  In Britain, and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat.

Here's the full address, in case you missed it in Febraury.  The examples continue to pile up, as do the howling double standards:


An Imam's radical anti-Semitic sermon is a tough judgment call for someone else to make -- but they slap handcuffs on silently praying Christians without a moment's hesitation.  This reminded me of when a Briton was arrested for complaining on social media about Palestinian flags in his neighborhood, just weeks after the October 7 terrorist attacks by Hamas.  His post was described by cops as "a racially aggravated Section 5 public order offence."  This, after authorities stood by while vast pro-terrorism, anti-Semitic marches were taking place on a regular basis.  Some of the only people detained at these hate rallies were peaceful counter-protesters.  For their own safety, you see.  Which is revealing unto itself.  It seems that holding what is technically the British government's own formal position on Hamas is a real problem in Britain.  Opposing a pack of murderous, bigoted savages might offend...certain people..  And we can't have that:


If calling Hamas "disgusting terrorists" is offensive to someone, that seems like a problem with them, not the person accurately condemning genocidal jihadists.  Who, exactly, is calling the shots in the United Kingdom these days?


One element of society, in particular, demands their "diverse religious beliefs" be "respected," to the exclusion of others, while attempting to impose supremacy.  And a lot of public officials are acquiescing.  A lot of 'elites' in this country share the same culturally suicidal mentality, too:


I'll leave you with this:

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos