Some Dems Mull Not Certifying a Trump Win
CNN's Senior Political Analyst Explains Why the Dems Are Bedwetting Right Now
The Chances of Republicans Retaking the Senate Are Pretty Solid
Que Mala Is Kamala
Knowledge, Stupidity, Virtue, Immorality
Among Donald Trump's Strengths: Keeping Violent Aggressors in Check
The White House Medical Report on Kamala Harris Won't Surprise You
Biden Said What About People Who Tell 'Lies' About the Hurricane Response?!
Gary Gensler Has to Go
HSI Scratches the Surface: The Expanding Investigation into Diddy's Alleged Criminal Empir...
Price Controls Are Harming Doctors
Fires, Pollution and Slavery: EVs’ Ugly Truth
Senseless Palestinians
Harris Can't Pivot From Bidenflation
American Families Are Paying the Price of Kamala Harris’ Failures
Tipsheet
Premium

By the Way, Despite His False Boasting, Biden's Budget Deficits Are Historically Staggering

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

We've written about this less-than-sexy topic on a regular basis, under administrations of both parties, because it matters.  We live in an era of bipartisan nonchalance about ballooning deficits and unsustainable national debt, but the math is the math, no matter what politicians do or say.  Some Republicans are actually concerned about fiscal discipline.  Others talk a decent game.  Democrats simply don't care, which is actually understating their recklessness.  They're committed to exploding the problem to new heights, and would gladly do so if they had just a few more votes in Congress.  They mouth platitudes about "deficit control" and "inflation reduction" when they believe such words might help with with public relations, but they don't mean a word of it.  The only time they really feign passion about curbing deficits is when it doubles as an opportunity to oppose tax cuts, which allow people to keep more of the money they earn.  

Given the record and the math, what's especially galling is when a figure like President Biden tries to claim credit for fiscal restraint.  He did so a few weeks ago with this total lie:

Completely, utterly false.  As I wrote at the time, "the US has run enormous annual deficits under Biden, and the national debt has marched ever higher.  The day Biden was sworn in, the federal debt stood at $27.7 trillion.  That number is now approaching $33 trillion."  I added, "what he's trying to say, and butchering it, is that deficits came down a bit on his watch, but that's only because COVID emergency spending expired. It has nothing to do with him."  Biden didn't bring down the debt by a penny, let alone $1.7 trillion; he's increased it enormously.  The supposed deficit reduction he's "achieved" is a result of one-time emergency pandemic spending automatically sunsetting.  And here's what's happening to our annual deficit anyway:

Those are the latest numbers out of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.  Axios also recently covered the historically stunning deficits:

The federal deficit is expected to nearly double this year, from about $1 trillion last year to $2 trillion for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30 There's no precedent for deficits this large, as a share of the economy — outside war, deep recession or pandemic. The WashPost's Jeff Stein reported Sunday on the stunning projected figure from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Such huge spending imbalances contribute to high interest rates for consumers including mortgages — in the short run. In the long run, it means interest costs will likely squeeze all other federal priorities.

The deficit was higher in 2021, in the teeth of the pandemic, but that's over.  We're not at war.  As the story says, "there's no precedent for deficits this large" under these conditions.  The inevitable retort from innumeracy-addled leftists is that the Trump tax cuts are the culprit, or the Pentagon spends too much, or millionaires and billionaires don't pay their "fair share."  We've heard it all before.  These are all debunked excuses.  The 2017 tax reforms boosted the economy and increased tax receipts.  Even if you pretend they didn't help the economy, and that erasing them entirely wouldn't have any negative impact, the total dollar amount in question is a tiny drop in the bucket of the larger problem.  The US does spend substantially on defense (a form of spending actually charged in our founding documents), but those dollars are totally swamped by entitlement spending, which 'progressives' refuse to reform, and actually want to expand.  

And 'the rich' very disproportionately contribute to the tax burden in this country, more so than in other developed countries.  Confiscating even more of their money, or all of it, wouldn't cover the gaping shortfalls DC has created.  Even functional Democratic SuperPAC Politifact admits this.  Sweeping all of this details aside, we do not have a revenue-side problem.  We have an over-spending problem:

Revenues are at or near record highs in modern American history, yet deficits are unsustainably enormous because the government is spending far, far too much.  That's the reality, no matter what the spin du jour might be.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement