Ridiculous: Judge Orders Construction Trump's White House Ballroom to Be Halted
Why Eric Swalwell Sent a Cease and Desist Letter to the FBI
DeSantis Demands Radical Judge's Impeachment After She Freed Predator Who Killed a Five-Ye...
Florida Attorney General Takes Bold Stance on Gun Rights Despite Criticism From Prosecutor...
Justice Jackson's Latest Dissent Reminds Us She Remains Unfit for the Supreme Court
You'll Never Guess What California Is About to Waste Billions on Now
Gavin Newsom's Press Office Trips Over His Own Ego As He Attacks Trump's...
Sherrod Brown Attends Fundraiser Hosted by Disgraced Politicians, a Felon, and a Racist
The Los Angeles Times Is Now Interested in Covering the CCP-Linked Biolab Story...
Guess Which Demographic Group Is Throwing Support Behind the Reform UK Party
Will the Insane Shutdown Ever End?
Man Charged With Robbing Teen Out of Jail After Gun Possession Arrest at...
Dan Bongino Tears Into Daily Mail Headline For Sowing Confusion Over Who Killed...
The Strait of Hormuz or the Gays of Hormuz—Watch This Actual Conversation With...
Nancy Pelosi Claims GOP Could Steal 2026 Midterms As Democrats Say Elections Are...
Tipsheet

Is 'Build Back Better' Dead?

Is 'Build Back Better' Dead?
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

My bet all along was that this Democratic Congress would pass the bipartisan infrastructure bill, then move on to a pared-down "reconciliation" spending package that Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema could stomach. The progressives would whine about it not being sufficiently mammoth in scope, but leadership would call it transformative – and it would be breathtakingly expensive in the scheme of things. There was always a non-zero chance that the "Build Back Better" part of the equation would falter and disintegrate, but my guess was that the Democrats would ultimately settle on something. That eventuality is still in the offing, but for the first time in this saga, I now suspect the spending spree is more likely to die than not. Why? There were multiple reports yesterday that Senate Democrats had at last determined that they'd banged into the same brick wall for the final time this year, opting to indefinitely punt BBB into 2022 and move on to another priority (which is perhaps even more unlikely to pass): 

Advertisement


Is it conceivable that inflation will come down, private negotiations with holdouts will bear fruit in the coming months, and BBB 2.0 will cross the finish line mid-election year? Sure. But there's probably a greater chance that inflation persists to enough of an extent that Manchin et al won't be terribly enthusiastic about reopening these battle scars, especially because the public is not clamoring for this bill. We recently reviewed polling data showing majority public opposition to the plan, particularly among independents, and the numbers are even worse in West Virginia. And inflation is plainly viewed as a clear and present danger to the economy, with very low excitement about a new round of massive spending that will add $3 trillion to deficits over the next decade: 

Advertisement


Republicans lead by four points on the 2022 ballot in the same poll. I'm not prepared to declare BBB DOA just yet, but the odds are stacked against it getting resurrected in the middle of an election year, especially if economic conditions remain daunting. If it's dead, that's an extraordinary development, and the country will have dodged an exorbitantly expensive bullet on several fronts. But that failure would be a very bitter pill to swallow for various coalitions among congressional Democrats: 


"Moderates" will be angry that they climbed out onto a limb, voted for controversial and assailable proposals, then the limb got sawed off anyway, with no new 'accomplishment' to show for it. Progressives will fume that the whole reason they held BIF hostage was because they feared Manchin doing exactly what he appears to have done to BBB. Pelosi will have effectively double-crossed the leftists while hanging the ostensible moderates out to dry. If that happens, will she maintain her self-awarded crown as "master legislator"? The NRCC seems eager to remind voters of the toxic provisions every single House Democrat (with one exception) voted for, on the record. Meanwhile, to distract their irate base from this BBB failure, Democrats will push more unrealistic lunacy, like killing the filibuster to nationalize elections in a constitutionally-suspect power grab (Sinema has already reiterated her opposition to changing the filibuster) and banana republic-style court-packing schemes

Advertisement


The NRCC got a big gift when House Democrats lined up against the wall and voted for BBB. The NRSC may have gotten a gift when the polarizing and abrasive Warren decided to vocally embrace adding seats to SCOTUS. This idea is unpopular and so radical that even Biden's commission refused to entertain it. And the brazenness of the politicized math behind it (add four sears for a 7-6 liberal majority – subtle! ) is impossible to miss. It'll be a fundraising tool and a turnout motivator for the GOP. Parting thought: The louder the tantrum, the likelier it is that BBB is cooked. 


UPDATE – Could a hugely pared down BBB, to the point that it's not really BBB anymore, be in the realm of possibility down the line? Maybe. I'd ask if progressives would revolt and torpedo it, but they always fall in line at the end of the day: 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement