Trump Signs Historic Digital Currency Protections Into Law
Tulsi Gabbard Releases New Docs on the Russian Collusion Hoax. Guess Who's the...
Republicans Flip the Script on Democrats' Epstein Files Bill
Wall Street Journal Does Not Get a Birthday Scandal Wish, and a Fox...
Evil, Thy Name is Democratic Party
The Terrible Cost of 'Hipster' Socialism
Is Ilhan Omar the New Standard-Bearer for Democrats?
What We Should Takeaway from DNI Gabbard’s Declassified Russia Hoax Documents
America’s Energy Mother Lode Is More Vital than Ever
One Year Later, This CNN Guest Still Won’t Admit Trump Was Shot in...
Trump Gets It Done: 10 Americans Back on U.S. Soil After Release from...
Kristi Noem Slams Leftist Media for Coddling Criminal Illegals with Sob Stories
Susan Collins Remains Frontrunner in Maine Senate Race
Trump Sues Wall Street Journal Over 'Fake' Epstein Story: 'I’m Going to Sue...
Congressional Democrats Hit Historic Low as Voter Backlash Grows Ahead of 2026 Midterms
Tipsheet

House Democrats: Please Don't Think Too Hard About Our Confusing Impeachment Stunt

As Cortney wrote earlier, the Democrat-controlled House Judiciary Committee voted this morning to set parameters for an impeachment inquiry into President Trump.  What does that mean, exactly?  Not much.  Chairman Jerry Nadler muttered confusingly about "nomenclature" and legal technicalities when asked whether this move constitutes pursuing impeachment.  This strange smoke and mirrors show isn't just ridiculous to people who aren't hardcore Democratic partisans.  It's irksome and frustrating to some elected Democrats, too:

Advertisement

Dissonant messages over the probe have prompted frustration among rank-and-file members, particularly those in competitive races wary of impeachment, and it even led to the House’s No. 2 Democrat walking back his statement on the committee’s investigation on Wednesday. …“This Committee is engaged in an investigation that will allow us to determine whether to recommend articles of impeachment with respect to President Trump. Some call this process an impeachment inquiry. Some call it an impeachment investigation. There is no legal difference between these terms, and I no longer care to argue about the nomenclature,” the New York Democrat said. “But let me clear up any remaining doubt: The conduct under investigation poses a threat to our democracy. We have an obligation to respond to this threat. And we are doing so.”

As Democratic strategists and MSNBC reporters express their bafflement at...whatever the hell this impeachment/non-impeachment investigation/inquiry is, it is becoming increasingly clear that it's not just the rank-and-file who are peeved by this pointless stunt: Leadership is annoyed and scrambling to get on the same page.  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi practically begged reporters to stop asking her about the issue, demanding that they go bother Mitch McConnell about gun control instead.  Are his party leaders on board for all of this, Jerry?  Er, no comment:  

Advertisement


They don't want to talk about it because they know what the truth is.  This is a clumsy kabuki dance for their impeachment-minded base, which does not actually entail any concrete steps in pursuit of the 'i-word,' in light of broader public opinion.  As has been the case for months, Democrats want to signal to their most fervent, angriest constituents that they're going to nail Trump, while simultaneously giving cover to members who represent swing districts.  It's transparent, stupid, and boring, as I said on Fox News this morning:


Somebody was watching, and evidently agreed:

Advertisement


How long will we have to endure this absurdity?  I'll leave you with Allahpundit's convincing timetable and explanation:

Chances are that the base won’t fully abandon impeachment until primary voting begins next year, at which point rolling a political grenade into America’s electoral tent would be too risky to justify. That means five more months of her having to lamely dodge questions like these from reporters and aggravating lefties in the process. If only she could just tell the truth — the “impeachment inquiry” is nothing more than a taxpayer-funded oppo research operation, with the fruits of Nadler’s investigation to be weaponized not in an impeachment proceeding but by the Democratic nominee next fall.

Sounds about right.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement