Well... Well... Well... Guess Which Dem Candidate Ms Rachel Just Donated to...It's Not...
Dems Know They Probably Should've Kept This Poll Private, Right?
New York Times Puts Brutal Dictator on Its Fashion List, Then Quietly Deletes...
Skynet Panic or Power Grab? Bipartisan Bill Would Let Government Shut Down AI...
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Efforts to Re-Detain Researcher Over Israel C...
Ted Cruz Makes Interesting Prediction About Democrats in 2028
Thought Crimes Come to Minnesota
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
The DNC Has Chosen Which State Will Be the First on the 2028...
This Is Who Mamdani Blamed for NYPD Violence
USA Today Stands by Nancy Armour's Ridiculous Caitlin Clark Column
Forcing Assisted Suicide Is Unconstitutional
Trump Demands Key 'Reconciliation 3.0' Step Passed Before August Recess
We've Got Details on ICE's Latest Arrests
Tipsheet

House Judiciary Passes Resolution on Parameters of Trump Impeachment Inquiry

House Judiciary Passes Resolution on Parameters of Trump Impeachment Inquiry
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

UPDATE: Following the vote, Nadler vowed to hold an "aggressive" series of hearings investigating corruption and obstruction allegations against President Trump.

Advertisement

ORIGINAL POST

House Judiciary Committee Democrats have passed a resolution to set the ground rules on an impeachment inquiry against President Trump.

"The conduct under investigation poses a threat to our democracy," Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) maintained in his opening statement. "We have an obligation to respond to this threat. And we are doing so."

The vote would, in part, allow Nadler to call impeachment hearings, and allow staff members to question witnesses in those hearings.

A fed up Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) tried to explain what was really going on.

"The Judiciary Committee has become a giant Instagram filter," he said. "To make it appear that something’s happening that is not."

After 32 months of investigations that have produced no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump colluded with Russia to win in 2016, still Democrats are pursuing other avenues that could lead to impeachment.

Collins has seen and heard a lot of in the past few years, but he is still shocked by his colleagues' willingness to grant their staffers so much responsibility.

"I’ve never seen a majority of members who desperately want to give their authority to staff members," he noted.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) had a similar message. He was frustrated that in the past 48 hours, the committee has voted to strip Americans of their Second Amendment rights, and to try and impeach the duly elected president.

Advertisement

Related:

JERRY NADLER

Jordan surmised that the Democrats are "trying to change the rules" because so far they've hit nothing but dead ends. 

"The Michael Cohen hearing was a flop," Jordan noted. "The John Dean hearing was a flop. And everyone in the country knows the Bob Mueller hearing...that was a flop."

But, Jordan added, the Democrats won't give up because they've "got to find something" to get this president in trouble.

Media have noted that the impeachment inquiry has sparked confusion among Democrats, many of whom are nervous to vote on such a controversial topic in an election year.

In early August, Nadler publicly declared that his committee had already launched impeachment proceedings despite taking no formal vote to do so. The claim sparked confusion, even among some Democrats, who sought clarification as they faced questions from progressive constituents about the status of the House's effort to recommend Trump's removal from office. (Politico)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has attempted to put the brakes on all this impeachment talk, urging her colleagues to focus on other issues.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement