So I Got a Call From The New York Times...
Why the Hell Should We Care If Democrats Don’t?
Israel Misunderstood
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 303: The Best of St. Paul
Greenland and the Return of Great-Power Politics
INSANITY: Mob of Leftist Rioters Stab and Beat Anti-Islam Activist in Minneapolis
U.S. Strike in Syria Kills Terrorist Linked to Murder of American Soldiers
Florida Man Convicted of $4.5M Scheme to Defraud U.S. Military Fuel Program
Chinese National Pleads Guilty to $27 Million Scam Targeting 2,000 Elderly Victims Nationw...
Orange County Man Arrested for Alleged Instagram Death Threats Against VP JD Vance
Hannity Grills Democrat Shri Thanedar After He Admits Voting Against Deporting Illegal Sex...
$68 Million Medicaid Fraud: Two Plead Guilty Over Brooklyn Adult Day Care Scheme
The Trump Administration Just Announced New Tariffs on Countries Deploying Troops to Green...
Minneapolis Alleged Gang Member, Felon Charged After Allegedly Stealing Rifle From FBI Veh...
JD Vance Just Destroyed This Indiana Republican for Failing to Act on Redistricting
Tipsheet

Trump: SNL's Obnoxious Liberalism Might Be Illegal Collusion, or Something

It's no mystery why President Trump wouldn't much care for this weekend's 'cold open' on Saturday Night Live, which borrowed from the Christmas classic, It's a Wonderful Life, to portray how much happier everyone would be if Hillary Clinton had won the presidency.   That premise is probably the most laughable element of the whole sketch, which prompted a fiery and ridiculous presidential response:

Advertisement


Kellyanne Conway is soulless, Eric Trump is stupid, Justice Kavanaugh is a weepy meathead drunk, the Vice President is repressed, etc., etc.  The tropes are stale and predictable.  That's the comedy offense here, in my opinion.  Also, depicting the First Lady as divorced from the president, and happily remarried to another wealthy and controversial man, in this alternate reality probably struck a lot of people as needlessly personal and mean-spirited.  If Trump had simply ignored the sketch, or specifically objected to the barbs directed at his wife and family, he may have won over more defenders and sympathizers.  Instead, he went with this:


Lame, lazy, partisan, paint-by-numbers comedy may be groan-worthy, but it's 100 percent protected by the First Amendment.  Obviously.  Even though that tweet doesn't seem terribly serious (the 'collusion' troll was a bit of a giveaway), it must be said that it's not healthy for public officials to be musing about weaponizing governmental power to limit or quell content they don't like.  Many conservatives rightly ripped into a Congressional Democrat's recent sentiment, wishing he could regulate Fox News; adherence to principle calls for consistency.  May I also remind the president that he literally hosted this show as a presidential candidate in 2015.  SNL's writers may have committed the ultimate comedy crime of unfunniness, but they're fully in the clear, legally speaking.  No court tests necessary.  I'll leave you with this sentiment, which I endorse:

Advertisement


The late night comedy scene has become an insufferable echo chamber of lefty pieties and anti-Trumpism.  We get it, guys.  We know exactly how you feel.  Now please make us laugh.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement